I was indelicately pointing out the possibility that Max E. Pad could be wrong and Krugman right, since Krugman is, after all, an economist.Quote from denner:
And Alan Greenspan is/was an economist as well, but that hasn't stopped you from calling him a disaster (rightfully so, I might add)...
Let's not forget that Krugger was right there in 2002 arguing in favor of creating a new asset bubble (in housing) to offset the deflating tech bubble. In your typical partisan fashion, you've called out Greenspan for his involvement in fostering the disastrous housing bubble, yet you continue to defend Krugger at every turn.
Sorry, you can't have it both ways.
But you are correct, and thank you for paying attention. I criticized Greenspan for, among other things, believing in equilibrium theory --the idea that markets would spontaneously tend toward equilibrium-- and not stepping in firmly to put a stop to liar loans. I am withholding judgement on Krugman -- I won't hesitate to criticize him later. I am not an economist, so if I were you I wouldn't put too much stock in my musings on economics.

I also believe that Bernanke has been a much better Fed Chairman than Greenspan, and handled things quite well considering, but I think Soros would have made an even better Fed Chairman. So I doubt you'll want to pay too much attention to what I think.