Quote from Yannis:
For me, breaking a rule that I have agreed to or established myself, is a sign that I don't trust it yet. It may be my fault and the solution may be better discipline, or it may be the rule's fault and it should be changed.
Therefore, the only thing that I have found to work in these circumstances, is backtest and/or papertrade the rule some more. Then, I either accept it deeper down and that helps my discipline - or develop a better argument how/why the rule should be changed or abolished.
My belief is that I am the best trader I can be, not while I'm developing methods to trade, but when I'm actually trading. That's when all my skills and abilities are being exercised. Not in the evening or during a quiet weekend when I feel like philosophizing and kicking some new ideas around. Theory is of no use if I cannot put it in practice or if my subconcious rejects it when things get real hot. A rule that I will discard in the heat of the "battle" is highly suspect - and that's why I always go back to investigate and see what's really happening here.
Excellent points you made...
I only have a few hard and fast rules... the remainder are pinciples and standards I seek to diligently apply to my trading thereby trusting my experience, instincts and trader intuition by allowing for some discretion. The 'few' rules I refer to are ones to deal with situations that have gotten me into the most trouble repeatedly... and thus a need to have some codification and a more mandatory edict on trading in given circumstances.
As you note trust is a large factor in honoring any trading code... and needs to be tweaked as a trader "grows" and perhaps even to suit different market conditions.
Iceman
