What do these three situations say to you?

Quote from jack hershey:

I hope this sticks.

I appreciate the attachment. Did the first several bars of today complete a "c" to "a" to "c" trend as you described it earlier in this thread?

-river
 
Quote from Redneck:

Just a simple observation

You joined in 04 (~ 9 years and 1 mo ago)

The majority of your posts are quoting / perpetuating/ praising Jack’s posts – in an apparent effort to “understand” his trading process


I get the distinct impression there’s a fox in the proverbial hen house

Dispute if you like, but all one has to do is look at your post history


Y’all kissing cousins possibly – :p


RN

If you review my IRS statements (public knowledge) you will see income from ET (I get paid to post). The corrolary is that I log my reply time as a business expense. The pro rata time cost in dollars is determined by my trading money velocity as determined by third party observers and their subsequent notarized sworn statememts.

Thankyou for this opportunity. A percent of an hour equates to about 1K as an expense of trading.

I type at about 240 words per minute on Dragon 9.

I do have a fox (grey, winter coat) in my living room. The taxidermy cost 850 this tax year. I will use your comment as a justification for the deduction.
 
Quote from river:

I appreciate the attachment. Did the first several bars of today complete a "c" to "a" to "c" trend as you described it earlier in this thread?

-river

No.

I was in a long Set D Drift channel from bar 69.

C to a to b to a to b by close.

The impending event was well under way with two P1's on bars 80 and 81. So I knew I would be long for at least three more events and probably five events.

I have a one page sheet hanging on my hen house wall as you know very well having collected eggs for your friends occasionally.

This sheet shows the b's that precipitate c's and the list is completely paired. Bar 79 was a PP1. The c's for a PP1 is BO, T1.

I have an rtl But a T1 is not in the cards too easily. so, as in poker, I am not going to draw to a BOT1 before a new a. An a has to have a b in Set D drift (established already), so I will have a b. This b could be any one of 7 EE's. Two of the seven lead to a variety of c's.

But the open is usually a range forming operation and a drift trend usually is sustained during the opening range building.

Roughly speaking I am planning to get out as the range is established. Then it is a Summertime Friday where TGIF applies.

Tonight is party time. I had to raise a China Berry tree limb to open up one of our patios for taller people. we are leaving the chicken coop door open.

Once I had to get up three times in the night to shoot a raccoon. I took three opportunities and called it quits. In the morning I found three raccoons at the bottom of their escape tree. Two parents and a kid. All the chickens were accounted for but my chainsaw had been thrown off the top of the chicken feed 45 gallon galvanized can. The lid was still tied on to the handles.

One of the mother hens laid an orange. Its chick was explaining about the orange moma laid.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

If you review my IRS statements (public knowledge) you will see income from ET (I get paid to post). The corrolary is that I log my reply time as a business expense. The pro rata time cost in dollars is determined by my trading money velocity as determined by third party observers and their subsequent notarized sworn statememts.



Thankyou for this opportunity. A percent of an hour equates to about 1K as an expense of trading.



I type at about 240 words per minute on Dragon 9.



I do have a fox (grey, winter coat) in my living room. The taxidermy cost 850 this tax year. I will use your comment as a justification for the deduction.


I have no desire to review your statements

But were you to have Baron verify he pays you to post – would assuredly substantiate your claim

Requiring supplemental income – though not uncommon – is unfortunate – especially considering your claims



My pleasure



Actually dictation software is not typing – 240 wpm is the ~ speaking rate of folks on the East coast


You overpaid for that fox mount - by ~35%

RN
 
This is what I said originally….

Quote from CoolTraderDude:

Are you saying that the dependant variable is the price bar and that the independant variable is volume...?

I honestly don't understand what you're saying...

Can you explain what the dependant and independant variables are...? I mean clearly... so that everyone can understand.

You could have spared me the drama and answered yes… But you didn’t because you’re a little bitch.


AND finally… This is what we get down below…

Quote from jack hershey:

The same.

Volume in any Hypothesis is the IF part. happily, we find price in the THEN part.

So now you see the beginning of the invention of the "System of the Operation of the Market".

You write out all the IF, ThEN'S to form a hypothesis Set and the name of the Hypothesis Set in general is PARADIGM.

Lets say you read this and still do not know which is the dependent variable or the independent variable.

All it means is that you mind can't handle how science and mathematics is applied to merkets.

Volume is the independent variable.

Your questions are unimportant.

Please do not answer my following questions.

What are you going to do now that you know volume is the independent variable? Keep betting in forex?

I am glad you found out the real Jack Hershey died along time ago. Everyone in ET knew that at the time he died.

I'm not he real jack hershey as everyone knows who looks me up.

Which again proves that you're a little bitch...
 
Quote from CoolTraderDude:

This is what I said originally….



You could have spared me the drama and answered yes… But you didn’t because you’re a little bitch.


AND finally… This is what we get down below…



Which again proves that you're a little bitch...

Of course.

You just presented the proof using my terms.

Learning maths is not difficult. I hope you begin and succeed at some point.

What is nice about the system of market's operation is that it is scientifically complete and there are no flaws, anomalies nor niose.

Everyone wishes you good luck with your new found knowledge.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

...
To have a PP3 there cannot be an internal (Wait) that interrupts the 3T1 ofrmation...
For PP3s I found this definition: "...a T1 between two consecutive P1's...".

But your quoted comment above seems to define PP3 as three TT1's. Which definition is correct?

Whenever I read "consecutive" or "accelerating" in your definitions does this always mean that between bar n-1 and n that there can/should be NEVER an internal for the definition to be true?

One last question... whenever you talk about "FIVE OOE's" are you referring purely to the volume OOE's or something like this:

1. Price: 4 moves (OOE's)
2. Volume: 5 moves (OOE's)
3. ? Forgot it, need to look it up
4. Category test procedure
5. ? Forgot it, need to look it up
 
Back
Top