Quote from Daal:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=753754816&play=1
his point is a very good one, on the last day of the contract there is no speculative bid or ask, you have the true economic players AGREEING to exchange oil at a price. thats the pure price of the commodity, he reports that he did not see prices nose diving on that last day. the guy he was arguing with looked like have never faced that argument in his life and kept trying to change the subject by saying specs roll over, exactly, on the last day you have the price ex-speculation
Everyone was correct in their own way. It's true that the entire open interest in the expiring month could roll. Ton's do. Look at spread volumes on expiration. Big. However Santelli's point is more on target.
It matters little who wants to take delivery. Chances are it is a commercial spreader who'll just re-deliver next month. However
if there was a glut of oil sitting around uncommitted in Cushing or wherever then producers would be selling the shit out of the front trying to make delivery. That selling pressure would evidence itself in the spread between the expiring contract and the second option month. Since the spread stays steady it doesn't appear speculative forces are distorting spot.
On the other hand I could argue-and we've seen squeezes in Chicago Wheat back in 2006 and in Mnpl this year-that if cash supplies are truly diminished it's almost impossible for anybody to make delivery and short covering of historic proportion takes place. Oil doesn't trade like anyone at all is squeezed. Did we see a $13 up day? Heck grains have 10% days all the time.
There's been a zillion reasons why oil has rallied and I'd put NYMEX speculation and Bush as the 2 biggest non-sequiter urban myths in the whole affair.
