That's 3.3333333333 years each, assuming you've been to: (1 bank x +3y) + (1 hedge fund x +3y) + (1 asset manager x +3y)
Aah. Would love to get a foot in there to see how it all works. Though I suspect I'm too old and I would be better off to leverage my >10y of software/platform eng experience in the retail/trading-on-my-own/quant-ish-maybe space
Better breakdown is 3 years on the sell side (rates & fx focus) and 7 years on the buy side (with a focus on active risk).
I think the benefit of working on the sell side is that it’s a much better place to learn about markets versus school or retail experience.
Prior to my professional career, I traded stocks, options, and fx as a student and also believed in the gibberish about technical analysis, that fundamentals were useless, that the pros are using better charts, etc. It wasn’t until I sat on the trading floor that I recognized the full degree of my dunning-kruger overconfidence.
I don’t think working on the sell side, or another buy side shop, is a requirement for being a very successful portfolio manager or analyst.
However, it is extremely hard to succeed without that experience because you simply do not know how good your competition is. It’s kind of like trying to train for a marathon (to place #1) and think you’re fast because you’re hitting 8:30mi which is very fast compared to most of your sedentary friends. (You have no idea how fast top marathon runners are and the competition it takes to place even in the top 10%).
Retail traders like
@SunTrader legitimately believe that the “pros” and “old hand”/“wise” traders are looking at charts and fooling with retail etc. In reality, the pros are investing significant capital in technology, have large research budgets and teams, and (lol) are not relying on technical analysis to make trading decisions.