What Could be in the Clinton E-mails?

Fox News is reporting that the FBI is blocking a FOIA request from Darrel Issa's House Oversight and Government Reform Committee for release of the tuna, potato chip, and Velveeta cheese casserole recipe found on Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's personal server. Issa's Committee is investigating a possible link between the recipe and Muslim Huma Mahmood Abedin who had access to the server and may have given the recipe to Kenyan Born, Muslim, U.S. President Barack Obama. Clinton was quoted as saying that she believed that the recipe was unclassified at the time it transmitted to her personal, unsecured server. A State Department classification expert has testified that under Department guidelines recipes, in general, would qualify for classification, in some cases as high as "Top Secret". A Fox spokesperson later said that Fox has since learned that it has been common practice for the State Department to send sensitive information coded as recipes. Recipes using expensive ingredients such Ortolans, truffles, Beluga caviar, Premier Grand Cru wines, etc., were used to code low level, less sensitive missives, and pre-prepared, every day food items such as Velveeta cheese and hamburger helper were used in coding higher level, secret communications. Recipes based on items such as Hostess Twinkies, Moon Pies and RC Cola were reserved for coding only the most sensitive and top secrete documents.

1_59907.jpg


A dinner featuring Ortolans en Brochette.
why investigate anybody for anything?
 
why investigate anybody for anything?
Well certainly not without the intent clearly evil. It is otherwise impolite and wastes all of our time, especially when it is condescending because its only purpose is to make the political opposition feel "as though no favoritism is being shown." In modern times, for unwise, or inadvertent mishandling of classified documents -- or in this case, documents alleged to have been worthy of classification -- hardly anyone has been prosecuted and no one has been convicted without vile intent having been shown; though to be sure, wild accusations, hard feelings, lost jobs, and ruined lives have resulted. My mother would have said, "grow up and move on."
 
Last edited:
Exactly! It is very impolite. Especially when it wastes all of our time and money and its only purpose is to make the political opposition feel "as though no favoritism is being shown." In modern times, for unwise, or inadvertent mishandling of classified documents -- or in this case documents alleged to have been worthy of classification -- hardly anyone has been prosecuted and no one has been convicted without vile intent having been shown; though to be sure, wild accusations, hard feelings, lost jobs, and ruined lives have resulted. My mother would have said, "grow up and move on."
Tell that to the FBI.
 
General Patreaus :
  • On April 23, 2015, Petraeus pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified materials. He was given a two-year probationary period and a fine of $100,000.[7]



Well certainly not without the intent clearly evil. It is otherwise impolite and wastes all of our time, especially when it is condescending because its only purpose is to make the political opposition feel "as though no favoritism is being shown." In modern times, for unwise, or inadvertent mishandling of classified documents -- or in this case, documents alleged to have been worthy of classification -- hardly anyone has been prosecuted and no one has been convicted without vile intent having been shown; though to be sure, wild accusations, hard feelings, lost jobs, and ruined lives have resulted. My mother would have said, "grow up and move on."
 
General Patreaus :
  • On April 23, 2015, Petraeus pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified materials. He was given a two-year probationary period and a fine of $100,000.[7]
Thank you for a nice example. And it illustrates why the Clinton case is purely political. Her poor judgement, however, needs to be taken note of.
 
Last edited:
Someone on another forum suggested a deal to split Syria's energy resources up with Russia (which wouldn't appear to be a crime, and probably should be privileged) or arranging for foreign-origin campaign donations (which could be more problematic).

Since none of our opinions really count, what is your speculative guess?

Hasn't this question already been answered? She was peddling top secret documents over an un-secure server for any asshole with a computer and an internet connection to see. She should be in jail for it, but according to the democrat party, she is too big to fail.
 
Well certainly not without the intent clearly evil. It is otherwise impolite and wastes all of our time, especially when it is condescending because its only purpose is to make the political opposition feel "as though no favoritism is being shown." In modern times, for unwise, or inadvertent mishandling of classified documents -- or in this case, documents alleged to have been worthy of classification -- hardly anyone has been prosecuted and no one has been convicted without vile intent having been shown; though to be sure, wild accusations, hard feelings, lost jobs, and ruined lives have resulted. My mother would have said, "grow up and move on."
well then tell the FBI to stop it!
 
None of the information she had at the time was marked classified, it was only afterwards.

Actually this has proven not to be true. A number of the emails were taken from the the state departments classified system (and were classified at the time) and cut & pasted over to the insecure email system in threads involving Hillary Clinton. Go read up on it.
 
Back
Top