Originally posted by shortnfool
Nicky,
Look at it this way....If their call went into money a dollar then promptly tanked, wouldn't they be justified reporting a dollar gain on the call? (Even if YOU were too stupid to manage the trade properly?) I'll bet you wouldn't be griping 'bout their reporting in that event, exits or no exits called. They can't hold your hand and trade your account for you. YOU must decide when to "hold 'em and when to fold 'em". Makes no difference, a dime or a dollar into the money is that amount of potential profit whether you took it or not. And reporting it as such is acceptable and justified. They can't all be home runs now can they nicky.
Perhaps it is YOU who should learn to trade properly.
short
fool
Hey Fool alias TRADERX, wrong again, as is normal for you, LOL.
Entries without Exits are no more than an attempt by a bunch of unqualified loosers to try and make a
bit of money by SELLING SIGNALS, LOL, as opposed to raking in the real dough by starting a fund and ACTUALLY TRADING, as opposed to CONNING NEWBIES.
Entries without exits? Hey, any FOOL can claim to be a great trader by spouting fully IRRELEVANT BS LIKE ENTRIES WITHOUT EXITS, LOL
Every signal selling moron apparently went to the same SEMINAR FOR CON MEN 101:
Let's say your signal says buy when price goes through 100. Ok, price moves through your entry signal, but immediately retraces to 95, before going back up to 101. It then goes down to 91.
Ok, what your looser buddies would claim in their BS marketing attempts would obviously be a winning trade, HAHA, good laugh that, it would have been a winning trade
IF YOUR STOP LOSS HAD BEEN BELOW 95, AND IF YOU WOULD HAVE TAKEN YOUR PROFITS AT 101!!
HINDSIGHT?
WOULDA_SHOULDA_COULDA??
Get the difference between that and the real thing???
HAHA
Hey, get a life, learn how to trade, LOOSER, and quit polluting these boards with your BS.
Go and post on YAHOO or some other site for LOOSERS.