Quote from MBAGearhead:
Any broker can commit fraud. Regulators need to put better protections in place that actually work and protect our funds.
Velocity is near bottom here:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/first-mfglobal-now-pfg-who-next
Quote from carpani:
The atlas ratings appear pretty accurate and I recently closed an account at MB trading due to their buggy systems, lack of customer service, control issues. Looking at Atlas ratings they're in the bottom of the list since they use Penson Financial Services as agent so beware. I would think people would look at these ratings and seriously consider moving to brokers up the rating list. Surprisingly alot of folks are on there towards the bottom that folks brag about (OEC, Velocity, FCM, RCG, etc). Seems like its not worth taking the risk even if you get some money back after 1 year of hassles and distractions caused by the next one to go under. Opportunity cost in a situation like that would be huge.
no, but I bet Lloyds could figure it out. When they get Flo to start advertising portfolio insurance on CNBC I may give them a call. I'd rather deal with the insurance company than the SIPC. The difference is, Flo doesn't really care what car you drive. Lloyds would keep a close eye on the broker.Quote from TerminatorXit:
If you do a quick search, www.atlasratings.com is registered to mkcglobal.com and Andrew McCormick -
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois-search/atlasratings.com
If you follow this you find - http://www.mkcglobal.com/contactus.html - the same guy.
Looks like a very small one man shop. Maybe that is why he does not realize that his list makes no sense. For example, OEC is owned by Schwab. At the close of business Friday, SCHW had a market cap of over $16B (yes with a B). It is comical this one man band can't even figure that out.