Only 500%, weak numbers compared to the elitetraders!!!
just a baseline. i know many here, probably the majority, do much better.
Only 500%, weak numbers compared to the elitetraders!!!
Good baseline, I personally wouldn't waste any time for less than 1000% per annum.just a baseline. i know many here, probably the majority, do much better.
Is it really that bad? To be profitable the RR must be through the roof?
I always use the venerable late great Jack Hershey, 92% winners, and a 500% yearly profit as a baseline
You don't need proof.I keep hearing about that guy, where is the proof?
You don't need proof.
You're on ET so it means you want to do this for a living. My suggestion.... read every single post/thread Hershey has ever posted. Don't spend money on get rich quick & don't trust "a new system for ruling the market."
It might take a year, ten or never, prolly the truth of the matter....never.
You'll be waiting an eternity, JH has gone to his maker.Lol thanks for trying to sound smart.
I have an audited third party track record,
if you've got proof of funds, I'll provide the documentation. It's as simple as that, one doesn't need to parade around and lie about what they do. It hurts everyone.
Where are the risk adjusted audited returns for Jack Hershey? I'm waiting.
I quit my day job a long long time ago and trading is my only job, but I work very hard at it, way more than your 1 hr a day.I do not have a second job, I trade for a living and I've done it for some years now.
Seriously, read everything about what I said on my earlier post. Read 15c3-1 from the Sec. Read Richard Werner's research papers, and read everything about buisness cycles. It will take thousands of hours.
You're on ET so it means you want to do this for a living. My suggestion.... read every single post/thread Maverick74 & Atticus have ever posted. Don't spend money on get rich quick & don't trust "a new system for ruling the market."

Well now...you just must have Tiny tiny SL LIKE 1 tick and a huge big PT like 100 points..ROFL. LOSE 50 times in the ES you lose 12.5 points. Win on 51st trade you make 100 points. Figure 5.00 comm rt. Net after comm 4,125.00 ...SO ON PAPER POSSIBLE BUT is it realistic? ROFL.I have seen traders with win rates of 70% and still lose money.
I can make money with only 15% win rate.
Yes I can have 50 consecutive losses.
And I don't use any martingales because it would be so huge.