What are the current limits of artificial intelligence? & their weaknesses

Zzzz1 said:
Thanks for the discussion everyone. Happy to have conversed with a few knowlegable people here, it's kind of refreshing and rewarding when one eventually finds the needle in the haystack.
More...
It was my pleasure.:p
 
Zzzz1 said:
Lol, that is all your brain is doing as well, except not in a loop but in some sort of event processing fashion. Are you some sort of Right wing Christian who also denies the technology to clone tissue exists? Please let us know so I can spare my time. I am Christian but I don't see any contradiction between my belief and science.
More...

Christian lol no devote athethis thanks there is no god get over it.

Your a fool, I've worked as a programmer for 30years, some of the work I've done you'd likely class as AI, but it really isnt.

Huge science fan, I just don't like bullshit
 
hmm, so far you have not contributed in any thread nor post on anything machine learning or AI related. Not even on the basics that you would reject to classify as AI. So, that science degree of yours must have been multiple decades ago and you must have slept over the past 15-20 years. Believe whatever pleases you, but stop denying hard-core facts re self-driven cars and their safety statistics. If you are embracing science so much then you should stick to facts. This was my last post to you in this thread. Choose whether to leave it at that or reply.

Turveyd said:
Christian lol no devote athethis thanks there is no god get over it.

Your a fool, I've worked as a programmer for 30years, some of the work I've done you'd likely class as AI, but it really isnt.

Huge science fan, I just don't like bullshit
More...
 
Zzzz1 said:
hmm, so far you have not contributed in any thread nor post on anything machine learning or AI related. Not even on the basics that you would reject to classify as AI. So, that science degree of yours must have been multiple decades ago and you must have slept over the past 15-20 years. Believe whatever pleases you, but stop denying hard-core facts re self-driven cars and their safety statistics. If you are embracing science so much then you should stick to facts. This was my last post to you in this thread. Choose whether to leave it at that or reply.
More...

Good on the last post, there is no point your an idiot living in fantasy land, teleporters arent real either :)

Cars arent being driven by AI , just complicated software which uses map data, gps and radar and image processing, its clever yes, AI no.

And no where have i said on the statistics, if anything i agree there safer, still wont trust for a few generations mind, not that I'll be able to afford to buy 1 ever ever anyway.

Driven over a 1/2 a million miles, zero crashes if it isnt broke don't fix it
 
The car of our average day trader and computer science "specialist" on ET.



clunker.jpg
 
My experience of neural nets in trading is that they are near useless in catching the twists and turns of the market. In fact no better than moving averages which only show the past and are not much use in predicting the future.
 
Humpy said:
My experience of neural nets in trading is that they are near useless in catching the twists and turns of the market. In fact no better than moving averages which only show the past and are not much use in predicting the future.
More...

If a human brain can't do it, why should a computer be able to do it better, even if it had REAL AI! ?

just because there good at scanning 15,000 stocks every 2 seconds looking for something simple, doesn't mean they can do complex things or the impossible.
 
Out of curiosity, what experience is that which you are talking about?

Humpy said:
My experience of neural nets in trading is that they are near useless in catching the twists and turns of the market. In fact no better than moving averages which only show the past and are not much use in predicting the future.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top