Problem is that market can top and may take much longer to drop than your expiration date has. Then you have the problem of the market having to drop enough below your strike price to make a profit.Quote from jimmyjazz:
If long puts are "cheap" at market tops, that screams "don't short the underlying, buy the put", right?
Quote from Look4aSine:
The word "cheap" should be replaced with "balanced" - there is no free lunch. But I think you'll be satisfied with how Puts act.
Maverick, is there a VIX level where you wouldn't buy calls because the implied volatility is too expensive (thus the rise in price would not sufficiently offset the volatility crunch)? Thanks in advance.Quote from Maverick74:I think puts are much tougher to trade on the long side then calls provided there is a put skew and there usually is.
Quote from blakpacman:
Maverick, is there a VIX level where you wouldn't buy calls because the implied volatility is too expensive (thus the rise in price would not sufficiently offset the volatility crunch)? Thanks in advance.
Quote from Look4aSine:
The word "cheap" should be replaced with "balanced"
Quote from jimmyjazz:
Eh, it was your link and the language they used.
Maverick, I trend trade part of my portfolio, typically looking for monthly prints to cross the 10-month SMA. It gets me short for most of the big drops. When the peak has passed but the trend is clearly down, have the puts typically already been bid up?
Quote from Squilly_D:
Reading through this thread (and elite trader forums in general), it would seem that the majority here are directional traders 1st and foremost. I myself started as a retail option trader learning that direction is secondary (or third...depending on who you ask). I use option strategies to play chess, not checkers, but to each there own. It boggles my mind to see the use of options in their most non-optimal form:eek:...interesting indeed. This is not to say directional trading does not work, I just suck at it personally, but I'm killing it on non-directional front.