Why not re-open Benghazi while he is at it? Sure there is more on that bone, bone.
Hey, maybe Nunes have something to say worth repeating to us.
What about Hillary's server they said....
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
Why not re-open Benghazi while he is at it? Sure there is more on that bone, bone.
Hey, maybe Nunes have something to say worth repeating to us.
Benghazi is not related to the Russian election interference investigations as far as we know.
Yep, They should do the exact same thing they did to Hillary for doing the same.
No, she should not. She broke no law. The nations top cop said so, and said it to the entire world. The AG agreed, so did the president at the time. The entire democratic party was in agreement as was the whole of the MSM. What Ivanka did may have been, what were the words, irresponsible and reckless, but no law was broken. If Hillary didn't break any law, neither did Ivanka.
The only hypocrisy is that of the left. You guys have, and continue to state that Hillary broke no laws. Everyone else "mistakenly" thought that Hillary had committed a crime, BUT, top law enforcement deemed her actions to be perfectly legal. Consequently all similar activity moving forward is legal. The highest levels of law enforcement and government have said so.
Lets take an analogy. Say a person is caught going 60mph in a clearly posted 45mph zone. This person is let go, but not in a quiet, one on one way. No, the nations top law enforcement very publicly state that it's perfectly okay for this person to have been going 60 in a 45. The entire government says it's okay. The entire MSM says it's okay. The American public sees this and very predictably thinks that it must be okay to go 60 down that road. Why wouldn't it be?
Time passes and another person is going 60 on the same road. You're telling me that this person is now breaking traffic laws? Who is the hypocrite?
If it was okay for Hillary, it's okay for Ivanka, and anyone else. Either the law applies to all equally, or it doesn't apply at all to anyone.
Until the Ivanka email thing, I didn't realize that you had come to terms with the Hillary email thing.
I have come to terms with not caring about republicans accused of doing the same thing for which democrats have been given a pass. If Hillary obviously breaking the law is okay with you, then Ivanka doing the same thing is okay with me.
I think you're missing the point that what makes the Ivanka email thing so irresistible is that it was predicated on the Right's outrage over the Hillary email thing.
You guys are just getting your own shit rubbed in your noses. A teachable moment?
Last edited: