Quote from piezoe:
Isn't it more or less a matter of degree? I don't understand those that want no regulation and no government interference with capitalists-- that want total laissez faire capitalism. Ironically, that will only lead to calls for more government regulation rather than less, and likely bad regulation at that. A perfect example is the repeal of Glass-Steagall in 1998. That's what the capitalists wanted, and it led to financial ruin and more, but not necessarily better, regulation. So I would argue that for their own good capitalists should want both good government regulation and a level playing field. But they don't. They want no regulation and monopolies and cartels.
Free markets are what you get when you have regulations in place and enforced that prevent monopolies and cartels from forming and encourages competition. This creates a fertile climate for innovation.
I don't see why free markets can't exist within both socialist and capitalist societies, but probably not easily in a communist society, of course, since in communist states capital and the means off production are controlled by the State.
I have noticed that many posters here on ET like to speak of capitalism and free markets in one breath as though they were one in the same. They are not.