We'll Tell You How Dangerous Ebola Is After The Election

fZU1rmh.jpg
 
I think Dr. Ablow raised a very valid issue. What exactly is motivating obama to expose the country unnecessarily to a disease that could conceivably kill tens of thousands of people if not more?

I've postulated for years, ODUMBO IS INTENTIONALLY TRYING TO DESTROY AMERICA! (He's claimed to be a Christian, but his behavior and Freudian slips have been that of a Muslim... just last week Odumbo proclaimed that with Muslim population of 0.3% in America, 'we should be considered a Muslim country'... and as a Muslim Terrorist, hell-bent on destroying America, he can do more damage from the WH than 1000, 9/11s.)

An emailer wrote in to O'Reilly's show 2 days ago and suggested the same thing. O'Reilly's response, "this guy's a total loon".

What else would "...motiv[e] obama to expose the country unnecessarily to a disease that could conceivably kill tens of thousands of people if not more?"

America is getting a flood of bad news across the southern border, too. I don't buy the "it's because both parties want cheap labor" argument at all.

Dick Morris says "... Obama's goal is to transform America into a 1-party country"... "so that the Democrats remain in power virtually permanently, with all other political voices permanently overwhelmed and irrelevant".[and eventually silenced?] Does that remind anyone of other political regimes in history?

Maybe Morris is right, but wouldn't that be "destroying America" as we've known it?... at least until the DemoCrap/Socialist/Progressive cancer got its hooks into us?

Dictatorial rule by the Totalitarian Left? Is that what America is now all about?


:(
 
Last edited:
I've postulated for years, ODUMBO IS INTENTIONALLY TRYING TO DESTROY AMERICA!

An emailer wrote in to O'Reilly's show 2 days ago and suggested the same thing. O'Reilly's response, "this guy's a total loon".

What else would "...motiv[e] obama to expose the country unnecessarily to a disease that could conceivably kill tens of thousands of people if not more?"

Tens of thousands of people die from the flu every year. What do you propose that we do about that?
 
Actually, it's a rational response, as opposed to a hysterical one.

No, it wasn't a response to the original question.
It was entirely different discussion about an entirely different topic. Start a new thread if you want to discuss influenza.
 
No, it wasn't a response to the original question.
It was entirely different discussion about an entirely different topic. Start a new thread if you want to discuss influenza.

You mean all comments, questions et al in all threads have to pertain to the OP? Wow.

I didn't say the response was to the original question; I said that it was a rational response. As opposed to the general drama queen response that is so common here.
 
No, it wasn't a response to the original question.
It was entirely different discussion about an entirely different topic. Start a new thread if you want to discuss influenza.

He's challenged .. yesterday he tried to hijack a thread from Ebola to guns. Typical liberal who can't follow along ... but back to the topic ..

I've never known of a President who seemingly encouraged sick people to come to the US and infect others with a deadly disease.
 
"... I've never known of a President who seemingly encouraged sick people to come to the US and infect others with a deadly disease.

Even worse... the message apparently is "..if you've got ebola, try to make your way to America where we will treat you... tax payers will pick up the tab. And if your journey exposes others who end up dying, no biggie."

WTF??
 
Back
Top