Welcome to Maywood, Mexico

[stu]

Quote from jem:

1. you gave demograhics Stu... are you controlling your emotions enough to see the difference between definitions used by poll takers and definitions given by a respected dictionary?

In summary

Theists have faith there is a God.

Atheists - say they know there is no God.

One of those groups is filled with irrational emotional people and you are their poster child.

Nope.
I gave definition. It's not mine. It’s Wiki's. So again as you would say..... " it’s Jem against Wiki ".
Next up " Jem v Online Dictionary". Probably not "respected" enough because it doesn't agree with your own prejudices.

Definitions in all dictionaries change over time as contemporary understanding recognizes old fashioned simplistic explanations and usage (like yours) won't do anymore.
Definitions of agnostic is one such word which is illogical in a religious context .
Still it is to be expected as religious and illogical are words that compliment each other so well.

If theists only have faith there is a God, then they do not know there is a God. Then they are agnostic according to your own definition.

That's the problem with your very dumb definitions of agnostic. They backfire right up your own ass, turning all theists into agnostics. But of course you are too dumb to comprehend that, being content with illogical definitions the way you are.


You just said you were done with this thread. It appears you are also too dumb to know when you are done.

 

[maxpi]

I lost my faith in Science a long time ago. I'm a Science agnostic and always will be... they lied to me once too often and that was it, over... I feel so free now...

 

[stu]

Quote from maxpi:

I lost my faith in Science a long time ago. I'm a Science agnostic and always will be... they lied to me once too often and that was it, over... I feel so free now...

.....then you must be extremely agnostic about your post making any real sense.

 

[res judicata]

Quote from stu:

Nope.
I gave definition. It's not mine. It’s Wiki's. So again as you would say..... " it’s Jem against Wiki ".
Next up " Jem v Online Dictionary". Probably not "respected" enough because it doesn't agree with your own prejudices.

Definitions in all dictionaries change over time as contemporary understanding recognizes old fashioned simplistic explanations and usage (like yours) won't do anymore.
Definitions of agnostic is one such word which is illogical in a religious context .
Still it is to be expected as religious and illogical are words that compliment each other so well.

If theists only have faith there is a God, then they do not know there is a God. Then they are agnostic according to your own definition.

That's the problem with your very dumb definitions of agnostic. They backfire right up your own ass, turning all theists into agnostics. But of course you are too dumb to comprehend that, being content with illogical definitions the way you are.


You just said you were done with this thread. It appears you are also too dumb to know when you are done.

.

When you get to logic class ask the teacher to go over sets and subsets with you.

Then you can learn about how pollsters group people in sets without changing the dictionary definition.

 

[stu]

Quote from res judicata:

.

When you get to logic class ask the teacher to go over sets and subsets with you.

Then you can learn about how pollsters group people in sets without changing the dictionary definition.

I'll tell you what, take your own advice....

….then when you have a better idea of what is going on here, go tell Wiki why you are trying to say how a Definition of theirs which is different to some dictionary definitions, is not a Definition because pollsters group people into sets without changing dictionary definitions …just because their Definition fits with other dictionary definitions you might not happen to agree with , and despite them logically defining agnostic anyway..

Then when you've learned that much, why not come back and see if you can grasp how the reason for defining agnostic in a religious context doesn't make sense despite any of those dictionary definitions you might just happen to agree with.