Brown power is a joke. If they were going to be wealthy and powerful they would be already... Black power is a bigger joke, they got shoved into ghettos much like Indian Reservations with no chance of ever getting a good job in the private sector. Jessie Jackemup makes sure they'll never be considered for employment, you have to be nuts to hire a Black with ole' Jessie looking over his shoulder with a big grin and some lawsuit papers...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Welcome to Maywood, Mexico
- Thread starter 377OHMS
- Start date
Quote from stu:
The problem with your argument is unlike your God, evolution is a fact not an idea, and therefore quite inconsitent with superstitious beliefs.
Ok who or what created your fact or at least how did it come into existence?
Answer - neither you nor any other atheist has a clue (if you were not ignorant you would be agnostic).
Therefore - your statement is born of ignorance, pointless and irrelevant.
You sure get your panties in a fluff real quick . Just a silly irrational belief makes you so aggressive, defensive and irrational.Quote from jem:
Ok who or what created your fact or at least how did it come into existence?
Answer - neither you nor any other atheist has a clue (if you were not ignorant you would be agnostic).
Therefore - your statement is born of ignorance, pointless and irrelevant.
Evolution is not about creation, so if you're going to ask inappropriate questions, why not ask yourself who or what created your imaginary creator God or at least how did it not come into existence?. Although it won't make you any more sensible.
Evolution is a fact , it's not my fact. People are entitled to their own opinions not their own facts.
Oh and agnostics must be atheist otherwise they'd be theists.
Quote from stu:
You sure get your panties in a fluff real quick . Just a silly irrational belief makes you so aggressive, defensive and irrational.
Evolution is not about creation, so if you're going to ask inappropriate questions, why not ask yourself who or what created your imaginary creator God or at least how did it not come into existence?. Although it won't make you any more sensible.
Evolution is a fact , it's not my fact. People are entitled to their own opinions not their own facts.
Oh and agnostics must be atheist otherwise they'd be theists.
I was the one who said evolution was not about creation.
So therefore your statement was ignorant and pointless - just like I said.
If agnostics must be atheist than all agnostics were be as ignorant as you and the word would be superfluous.
Agnostics say they see no proof so they doubt the existence. (rational)
Atheists say they know there is know God. (ignorant) - and you are a self proclaimed atheist.
Apart from being completely off topic to the thread, as usual you've lost the plot in just a couple of posts.Quote from jem:
I was the one who said evolution was not about creation.
So therefore your statement was ignorant and pointless - just like I said.
You were the one who asked âwho or what created the fact of evolution.â
So you figure that is saying - evolution is not about creation.
Still with religion at the forefront, rational and reasonable argument never did seem to be an option for you.
Quote from jem:
If agnostics must be atheist than all agnostics were be as ignorant as you and the word would be superfluous.
Agnostics say they see no proof so they doubt the existence. (rational)
Atheists say they know there is know God. (ignorant) - and you are a self proclaimed atheist.
Someone who says âthey see no proof so they doubt the existenceâ⦠is being atheist. A rational atheist.
As opposed to yourself and confirmed by your postsâ¦..an irrational theist.
Huxley who coined the word, used it as a joke. You know, like yourself, a joke.Quote from jem:
Always irrational Stu --- now changing the definition of atheist to agnostic.
1. Either he says he knows there is no God (irrational) .
2. Or he was an asswipe for injecting himself into this thread with a pointless comment. (asswipe)
It's not me changing definitions.... it's Wiki's definition you goof.
"Defining agnosticism
Demographic research services normally list agnostics in the same category as atheists and/or non-religious people.â
According to your argument
1. Either you say there is a God (irrational)
2. Or you are an asswipe for injecting yourself into this thread with a pointless comment.
There goes that unconscious self analysis thing you do so well.
2. Fits down to a tee.
Quote from stu:
Huxley who coined the word, used it as a joke. You know, like yourself, a joke.
It's not me changing definitions.... it's Wiki's definition you goof.
"Defining agnosticism
Demographic research services normally list agnostics in the same category as atheists and/or non-religious people.â
According to your argument
1. Either you say there is a God (irrational)
2. Or you are an asswipe for injecting yourself into this thread with a pointless comment.
There goes that unconscious self analysis thing you do so well.
2. Fits down to a tee.
That is your argument --- demographics?
They can't even define what an hispanic person is -- did you see how goofy the census was... oh you not an american are you?
Once again it is STU against the dictionary.
I am done with this argument. You lose again.
Quote from jem:
That is your argument --- demographics?
They can't even define what an hispanic person is -- did you see how goofy the census was... oh you not an american are you?
Once again it is STU against the dictionary.
I am done with this argument. You lose again.
Yeah ok you lose I know. You did that at the first brain spasm which must have tricked you into thinking you had a clue.
No, it is not my argument. You can't be this dim - seriously - can you?
You pathetically accused me of changing definitions when it's not just my definition, and I didn't change anything .
I've shown you Wiki produced that definition.
Now you clearly don't like Wiki's definition so it's going to be "Jem against Wiki" and "Wiki against the dictionary " is it.... along with "you are not an american are you?" ..
That's how moronic your arguments are.
I am simply pointing out there is no definition or description of agnostic that makes any logical sense in the religious context. You imagine agnostic can mean something it cannot logically or even reasonably be defined to mean.
You state it must be irrational for an atheist to know there is not a God , then it must equally be irrational for a theist to know there is a God. It must follow then according to your really very dumb assertions, everyone is an agnostic.
That's all your witless ideas ever lead to.
All over the place as usual with your religiously motivated bullshit and too dumb to know better
Quote from stu:
Yeah ok you lose I know. You did that at the first brain spasm which must have tricked you into thinking you had a clue.
No, it is not my argument. You can't be this dim - seriously - can you?
You pathetically accused me of changing definitions when it's not just my definition, and I didn't change anything .
I've shown you Wiki produced that definition.
Now you clearly don't like Wiki's definition so it's going to be "Jem against Wiki" and "Wiki against the dictionary " is it.... along with "you are not an american are you?" ..
That's how moronic your arguments are.
I am simply pointing out there is no definition or description of agnostic that makes any logical sense in the religious context. You imagine agnostic can mean something it cannot logically or even reasonably be defined to mean.
You state it must be irrational for an atheist to know there is not a God , then it must equally be irrational for a theist to know there is a God. It must follow then according to your really very dumb assertions, everyone is an agnostic.
That's all your witless ideas ever lead to.
All over the place as usual with your religiously motivated bullshit and too dumb to know better
1. you gave demograhics Stu... are you controlling your emotions enough to see the difference between definitions used by poll takers and definitions given by a respected dictionary?
In summary
Theists have faith there is a God.
Atheists - say they know there is no God.
One of those groups is filled with irrational emotional people and you are their poster child.