Quote from shortie:
Shorting an ETF is attractive because one is not exposed to a huge downside risk (e.g. 1987 or Flash Crash). One should not compare shorting QQQQ with going Long a financial stock.
Of course in the present market there is no downside risk :eek:
Buddy, you are so wrong. Going short you are exposed to important upside risk. Do not think going short is inherently safer then going long, in fact often it is riskier if you have limited capital.
And in a strong bull market, it is often problematic to be short.
In fact, many people have experienced this upside risk this month as the huge put/call disparity on SPY will attest to. It appears to me that you feel a slow and prolonged death of your investments is preferable to a quick jolt to your account. However, the first scenario is often a more sure fire way to lose money in the long haul.
Going long Canadian banks ( for example ) is one of the safest plays you can make. Strong yield, stable profitable companies, growing earnings, and a huge majority of shareholders in Canada simply hold these things forever.
I invite you to note how these two investments have done this year :
1. Buy a basket of Canadian banks ( or corresponding ETF ).
2. Short the S&P 500.
You may think #2 feels safer, but its not. During the "flash crash", I was watching BMO. It dropped $3 ( around 5% ), then regained it back. Much safer then holding the index actually.