@caroy Hey, it's Mike from the 20-delta SS Journal. You're a good man for laying this out every week and for sticking with it. I think you should totally get to take credit for ROI on capital at risk, so I'm glad you started doing that. In fact, I personally would drop the other number that's based on total capital. I'm glad the AMZN 5-delta short strangles have been working from you.
I've been studying butterflies a lot the last few days since we talked about them. I've finally come to understand that the risk profiles of a Long Put Butterfly, Long Call Butterfly, or Iron Butterfly are exactly the same (within a dollar or two anyway on max loss/max profit). I see that you bounce between Call and Put butterflies (leaving out Iron for the moment), and at first I didn't understand why you'd choose one over the other, so I searched and found this Reddit/options post that I think explains it:
"They are synthetically the same trade. One thing you can think of is assignment, if you believe the underlying will trade higher, go for puts. If it’s gonna trade lower go for calls. So if the worst happens and you get max loss, and you let your fly expire (not advised), you can take that max loss without having to deal with assignment and paying exercise/assignment fees. But that’s a tiny difference it’s negligible."
Is that the idea, that if the stock finishes above a Puts center then the Puts are worthless and you don't have to worry about them? Same if price ends below a Calls center? And I think you've been calling those 2 center short options the "guts" of the butterfly? That confused me at first because there's a trade called "Guts" that's a backwards strangle (similarly, "Short Guts" is a backwards short strangle). But you don't mean "guts" like that do you? Are you referring to what a lot of people call the "body" of the butterfly?
Iron Butterflies, I'm really digging them. Started trading narrowest-possible shortest-DTE IBs in a TDA paper-money account a couple days ago and they've been phenomenal. Worked 6 of them into my real-money account as 1-lots, and they haven't done as well, so I'm beginning to wonder if ICs trade differently in PM than real. Anyway, assuming that the risk profiles are all the same, is there any reason to NOT just go with Irons? They appeal to me the same way short strangles do: let me get paid first, then let the market try to take that money back. But is it that if you're short a put AND a call in the middle, then wherever spot is, one of those is always going to be ITM and therefore subject to early assignment? Or is there some other reason?
Oh, and why don't you use GTC buy-to-close orders at 10 or 20% like we've talked about? Seems like that would make your Friday mornings less hectic, but you probably have a reason. I've been using 25% in the PM acct and they've been coming off with zero effort. I think I've decided that if they go to max loss I'll just take that, but I'm not firm on that yet.
Looking forward to your picks today so I can play along now that I'm caught up!
Be good,
Mike