Wealthy Clintons Use Trusts to Limit Estate Tax They Back

Liberals are not known for eating their own cooking.

The democrats biggest constituency is probably teachers unions. Virtually every prominent democrat sends or sent their own kids to pricey private schools. Then they oppose vouchers so less well-off can do the same and escape horrible public schools.
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
Liberals are not known for eating their own cooking.

The democrats biggest constituency is probably teachers unions. Virtually every prominent democrat sends or sent their own kids to pricey private schools. Then they oppose vouchers so less well-off can do the same and escape horrible public schools.
More...

This is no different than, for one example, Sheldon Adelson: “I’m against very wealthy ­people attempting to or influencing elections. But as long as it’s doable I’m going to do it."
 
Ricter said:
This is no different than, for one example, Sheldon Adelson: “I’m against very wealthy ­people attempting to or influencing elections. But as long as it’s doable I’m going to do it."
More...


No, it's not the same thing at all.

Sheldon Adelson did not pass a law prohibiting other people from influencing elections and then try to influence an election himself.

DUH
 
Banjo said:
Bill and Hillary Clinton have long supported an estate tax to prevent the U.S. from being dominated by inherited wealth.[/url]
More...

Somehow they believe "inherited wealth" is evil. (Perhaps they don't believe inherited wealth is evil... perhaps it's as simple as just another excuse to impose tax... just because the Libtards want all of the tax revenue they can collect... moral or otherwise.)

How about the evil Liberal concept of "vote for me and I'll take money from somebody else and give it to you"?? What's more Commie than that??

As I've said before... "LIBERALS ARE POLITICALLY CHICKENSHIT COWARDS WITH NO MORAL COMPASS"... their only concern is political/personal power.

:mad:
 
Scataphagos said:
Somehow they believe "inherited wealth" is an evil.

How about the evil Liberal concept of "vote for me and I'll take money from somebody else and give it to you"?? What's more Commie than that??

As I've said before... "LIBERALS ARE POLITICALLY CHICKENSHIT COWARDS WITH NO MORAL COMPASS"... their only concern is political/personal power.

:mad:
More...

"How about the evil Liberal concept of "vote for me and I'll take money from somebody else and give it to you"?? What's more Commie than that??"

You're right, giving people unearned money is evil.
 
Ricter said:
"How about the evil Liberal concept of "vote for me and I'll take money from somebody else and give it to you"?? What's more Commie than that??"

You're right, giving people unearned money is evil.
More...
I am glad to see you call for merit based income.
Forcing a company to pay a minimum wage of $15 is giving unearned money to a worker
 
Mercor said:
I am glad to see you call for merit based income.
Forcing a company to pay a minimum wage of $15 is giving unearned money to a worker
More...

Since when have I not advocated anything but "merit based"? Up until the Communist Libtard Leftists got their jackboots on the throat of PC society, America was a MERITOCRACY!

I don't believe anybody deserves any damned thing except for what they earn for themselves.. and especially not at the expense of other citizens. And yes, that includes "ALL Affirmative Action is BULLSHIT!!" (SUCK THAT NOTION, SHARPTON, JACKSON, ODUMBO!)

Just think, without Affirmative Action, America wouldn't have the Islamic terrorist, Communist Odumbo as president!
 
Trader666 said:
"... society's layabouts "deserve" it more.
More...

That's what greedy, chickenshit Libtard politicos spew to get elected... and of course, the greedy layabout "recipients of wealth distribution" are "down wid dat".

And as the parasite class is >50% of voters, we're doomed!

:(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top