lolLordy I hope there are tapes. Democrats will say they say something totally opposite if you play them backwards.
lolLordy I hope there are tapes. Democrats will say they say something totally opposite if you play them backwards.
If you want me to engage you in this discussion, you will have to try harder. Like, for example, what part of the article do you dispute, and evidence to support your position.
Great, now we can discuss something tangible.The part where the NYTimes cited their source - they were people who heard about the incident, NYTimes wasn't citing any memo. Comey said during his testimony that he told additional people about the incident so it's easily explained that memo wasn't the only source.
"The conversation that night in January, Mr. Comey now believes, was a harbinger of his downfall this week as head of the F.B.I., according to two people who have heard his account of the dinner."
Fox News is hoping that you don't read the original, they are spreading fake news.
Great, now we can discuss something tangible.
Not sure Fox news would want to hide stuff on Trump, there are many articles and tv reporters that are critical of him. At any rate, if the conversation was held strictly between Trump and Comey in private, and the nature of the conversation gets to the press, there is obviously a very short trail to the leaker. It would be incredible if Trump set this guy up to fall, as he might have thought Comey was the leaker indeed. Looks like he got the guy.
We are looking at this from two different perspectives. To me what's important was to find the leaker, which seems to have happened. Only time can tell.Comey said during his testimony that he immediately talked about it with his colleagues so memos weren't the only source.
Secondly, there is no executive privilege here, why would Comey fall over this? The moment Trump went on twitter and talked about 'tapes', he lost any implied privilege - this was litigated during Watergate and court held that public had the right to know even if the President was involved in such conversations.
To me what's important was to find the leaker, which seems to have happened. Only time can tell.
He clearly proved he had the ability to be 'a' leaker. We shall see if he was 'the' leaker.It's a total red-herring - leaking an unclassified document in his own possession that he wrote himself without any executive privilege invoked has nothing to do with all the leaks coming out of the WH.
He clearly proved he had the ability to be 'a' leaker. We shall see if he was 'the' leaker.
First, you are just repeating the Breitbart spin on the whole thing - the main question since Comey firing was the obstruction part
Secondly, regarding Trump being under investigation for collusion, the obsession will start now after this exchange.
COTTON: Do you believe Donald Trump colluded with Russia?
COMEY: That's a question I don't think I should answer in an open setting.