We Knew It Was Only A Matter of Time...

[Lucrum]

Quote from BSAM:

The Constitution uses the word "arms". Can we agree that an AR-15 and a shoulder fired missile launcher are both "arms"?

In THAT context, I suppose so.

...just trying to help you understand... the need for weapons control in the USA.)

We ALREADY have weapons control in the USA.

Why aren't US citizens allowed to have the "arm" known as the shoulder fired missle launcher?

Because the federal government says we can't? I dunno what you're looking for here.

(Sorry for keeping you up so late brother.)

You didn't, I went to bed.

 

[BSAM]

Quote from Lucrum:

...Because the federal government says we can't? I dunno what you're looking for here....

Oh Luke...You're a plenty bright guy. So, stop playing dumb. You know what I'm looking for. We know the government stance.

Why do you think we shouldn't have access to the shoulder fired missile launcher?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from BSAM:

...Why do you think we shouldn't have access to the shoulder fired missile launcher?

Because you'll shoot your eye out with it?

Seriously though, who is suggesting that anyone be allowed to own or carry shoulder fired missile launchers in the first place? No offense but this seems like a rather silly and even irrelavent argument for even more gun control than what we already have.

 

[BSAM]

Quote from Lucrum:

.....No offense but this seems like a rather silly and even irrelavent argument for even more gun control than what we already have.

Okay. If you don't want to answer why, it's okay.

The answer, of course, is because of the possibilities for bad people to do bad things with them. It's the same reason why many of us are against certain other weapons and in favor of much stricter gun control in this country.

So, of course, the level of arms control is not silly or irrelevant, but then what else does one respond with when he just can't admit that arms control in a civilized society is mandatory?

At least we both believe in arms control. We just differ on the level.

Like I said on page one:

STOP THE MADNESS!

Now...Will you be campaigning for the reelection of Barack Obama?

Just kidding.

 

[Landis82]

Quote from BSAM:

Okay. If you don't want to answer why, it's okay.

Lucrum posted 32 times yesterday.
He's posted another 10 times today and it isn't even lunch time yet.
And yet, he still never seems to answer the question. He just LIVES on ET because his life is so pathetic. Doesn't get out much. Ever notice that?

 

[pspr]

Quote from Lucrum:

Because you'll shoot your eye out with it?

Seriously though, who is suggesting that anyone be allowed to own or carry shoulder fired missile launchers in the first place? No offense but this seems like a rather silly and even irrelavent argument for even more gun control than what we already have.

I agree. BASM was beginning to sound a bit ridiculous in his questions. Sounded like he was trying to trip you up or something. It wasn't very honest discourse on his part. I took the pleasure of tossing him in the bin with Optional.

 

[BSAM]

Quote from pspr:

I agree. BASM was beginning to sound a bit rediculous in his questions. Sounded like he was try to trip you up or something. It wasn't very honest discourse on his part. I took the pleasure of tossing him in the bin with Optional.

LOL

You just got to love this place!

Pspr...Being a real conservative doesn't mean one has to be a redneck or stooooopid.

LMAO

You guys are a trip!

 

[BSAM]

Quote from pspr:

.....I took the pleasure of tossing him in the bin with Optional.

(Still laughing!)

Tossed me in the bin with Optional. That's too funny. Thanks for a great laugh today! I'm serious.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from BSAM:

The answer, of course, is because of the possibilities for bad people to do bad things with them.

You could say that about almost anything, including automobiles for example. But then you said you were OK with banning them. Are you actively campaigning to do so?

So, of course, the level of arms control is not silly or irrelevant...

I didn't say it was, only that YOUR argument for more gun control was silly and irrelevant.

...but then what else does one respond with when he just can't admit that arms control in a civilized society is mandatory?

I'm not sure that it is "mandatory" at least not the way you and the left seem to think so.

Like I said on page one:

STOP THE MADNESS!

Like I said in response, more gun control isn't going to accomplish that. Yet you're fixated on more gun control anyway.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Landis82:

Lucrum posted 32 times yesterday.
He's posted another 10 times today and it isn't even lunch time yet.
And yet, he still never seems to answer the question. He just LIVES on ET because his life is so pathetic. Doesn't get out much. Ever notice that?

32 times? OMG! At this rate it'll take forever to catch up with your own 5.09 average posts per day. Which is a full 30.5% more frequent than I post. Does this mean you get out even less? Does it mean your life is even more pathetic?

(I actually get out quiet a bit in fact, I travel for a living)