Quote from 377OHMS:
Only landowners of good repute should have voting privileges.
No felons, apartment dwellers, latte drinkers or anyone that owns a labrapoodle. Ownership of a Prius means instant disqualification from voting in the United States. No chicago faggots wearing square-toed elf shoes either. In fact, no one in Illinois should be allowed to vote, California too for that matter.
There. Anymore big problems you need solved?
Quote from 377OHMS:
Only landowners of good repute should have voting privileges.
No felons, apartment dwellers, latte drinkers or anyone that owns a labrapoodle. Ownership of a Prius means instant disqualification from voting in the United States. No chicago faggots wearing square-toed elf shoes either. In fact, no one in Illinois should be allowed to vote, California too for that matter.
There. Anymore big problems you need solved?

Quote from Ricter:
I hear ya on the square-toed elf shoes, I wish I could fire the guys that wear those in my office.
Anyway, I just posted a variant of your only-property-owners-can-vote this week. The rules I would like (would need fleshing out, of course, we'd call the lawyers):
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3216117&highlight=encumbrance#post3216117
1) You must own your property free and clear, no debts, no encumbrances.
2) Your property must be worth $2 million or more for the current period.
3) You cannot have merely inherited your property.
Someone else suggested that only taxpayers should get to vote, but that would allow those on unemployment to vote (I'd have to check and see if that varies by state, etc.), but maybe we could add that as a fourth rule.