It is beyond belief that no one is asking about Social Security in the 2016 debates - the single most popular social program in US history. With the cost of living skyrocketing, something like 10% of Americans with any sort of savings, destroyed 401k plans if you are lucky to have one, and social security benefits that are not going up because of the CPI scam run by the US government.
So get this straight, millennials can't find jobs, so they move in with their parents. The graying of America is coming upon us at a remarkable rate, with huge numbers of people that are going to rely on SS, which won't cover costs, so the elderly will have to move in with their children.
Jesus H. Christ.
Harvard Study: Social Security In Far Worse Shape Than Official Numbers Show

Janet Novack ,
Forbes Staff
I write from D.C. about tax and retirement policy and planning.
Tweet This
In a second paper appearing today in Political Analysis, the three researchers offer their theory of why the Actuary Office’s predictions have apparently grown less reliable since 2000: the civil servants who run it have responded to increased political polarization surrounding Social Security “by hunkering down” and resisting outside pressures—not only from the politicians, but also from outside technical experts. “While they’re insulating themselves from the politics, they also insulate themselves from the data and this big change in the world –people started living longer lives,’’ coauthor Gary King, a leading political scientist and director of Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science, said in an interview Thursday. “They need to take that into account and change the forecast as a result of that.”
In its annual report last July, Social Security predicted its old age and disability trust funds, combined, would be exhausted in 2033 and that after that point the government will have enough payroll tax revenues coming in to pay only about three quarters of promised benefits. King said his team hasn’t estimated how much sooner the fund might run out, but described it as in “significantly worse shape” than official forecasts indicate....
http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetno...shape-than-official-numbersshow/#6b2d355043cc
So get this straight, millennials can't find jobs, so they move in with their parents. The graying of America is coming upon us at a remarkable rate, with huge numbers of people that are going to rely on SS, which won't cover costs, so the elderly will have to move in with their children.
Jesus H. Christ.
Harvard Study: Social Security In Far Worse Shape Than Official Numbers Show
Janet Novack ,
Forbes Staff
I write from D.C. about tax and retirement policy and planning.
Tweet This
- Over the last 15 years, the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Chief Actuary has consistently underestimated retirees’ life expectancy and made other errors that make the finances of the retirement system look significantly better than they are
- the Actuary has overestimated the birth rate—meaning the number of new workers who will be available to pay baby boomers their benefits 20 years from now
In a second paper appearing today in Political Analysis, the three researchers offer their theory of why the Actuary Office’s predictions have apparently grown less reliable since 2000: the civil servants who run it have responded to increased political polarization surrounding Social Security “by hunkering down” and resisting outside pressures—not only from the politicians, but also from outside technical experts. “While they’re insulating themselves from the politics, they also insulate themselves from the data and this big change in the world –people started living longer lives,’’ coauthor Gary King, a leading political scientist and director of Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science, said in an interview Thursday. “They need to take that into account and change the forecast as a result of that.”
In its annual report last July, Social Security predicted its old age and disability trust funds, combined, would be exhausted in 2033 and that after that point the government will have enough payroll tax revenues coming in to pay only about three quarters of promised benefits. King said his team hasn’t estimated how much sooner the fund might run out, but described it as in “significantly worse shape” than official forecasts indicate....
http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetno...shape-than-official-numbersshow/#6b2d355043cc