Washington Post Sold To Jeff Bezos

There are a lot of tears being shed in DC today after yesterday's shock announcement that the Washington Post, house organ of the democrat party, was sold for a relative pittance to Jeff Bezos of Amazon.

I was upset myself because I was hoping to see the day it filed for bankruptcy protection, hopefully after wiping out the Graham family's last assets. Alas, it is not to be, but at least I get the satisfaction of seeing a piece of the left's crown jewels auctioned off to some internet mogul. At least now he'll be on the A list for Washington dinner parties. That's worth something, so you can't say he just wasted his $250 mill.

Bezos was the perfect buyer because he has always had trouble understanding a profit and loss statement. No one who understands the difference between red and black ink would have bought this fast sinking ship. The question for him will be the same question asked of Sam Zell after he foolishly bought the LA Times. How long are you prepared to write checks to subsidize this new hobby?

The Post has lost readers by the trainload over the past few years. The only thing that kept the company afloat was some slocky test preparation business they bought and some television stations.

The Post has always been kind of a model for extreme media bias, but in the past few years, they have abandoned all pretence of running an honest news operation. Their mission is liberal advocacy. They have alienated a good portion of their potential subscriber base by staking out extreme positions on hot button issues like gay marriage, then pushing it relentlessly through "news" coverage. Even longtime readers have been complaining on the oped letters page that it is difficult to distinguish news articles from editorials.

Of course, their high water mark was hounding Richard Nixon out of office over a series of small-time scandals that wouldn't have made Bill Clinton's top ten list. Today, with another president hipdeep in horrifying scandals, they have devoted a ton of ink and front page space to... trying to destroy the conservative governor of Virginia over some nickle and dime dispute about a few thousand dollars in disputed gifts.

In sum, they are a disgrace to the news business and have a long history of hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty. If Al Jazeera had bought it, things could hardly have gotten any worse.
 
I'm very keen to see what Bezos can do with a newspaper. I've shopped at Amazon since it's earliest days, always been impressed with how well it all works. Google eschewed the alternative medicine [herbs, supplements] market for some reason, Amazon sells all sorts of supplements for great prices.
 
Quote from maxpi:

I'm very keen to see what Bezos can do with a newspaper. I've shopped at Amazon since it's earliest days, always been impressed with how well it all works. Google eschewed the alternative medicine [herbs, supplements] market for some reason, Amazon sells all sorts of supplements for great prices.

People my age, ie old, regard reading the newspaper as something you do every morning like brushing your teeth. Young people do not. We had some 20 something relatives staying with us, and every morning they were on their IPhones throughout breakfast. The Wash Post was there on the table, and they ignored it. They didn't seem to know what to do with it.

I saw a report saying what a great deal this was for Bezos and how he could make it financially successful by putting content behind a paywall. Seriously? They can't give it away now but people are going to pay? Do you think that idea might have occurred to the paper's former owners?

Bezos is on the wrong side of a major demographic trend here. He could spend a bit of money and vastly increase the abysmal quality of the Post. They fired all the editors and proofreaders. so it is filled with embarrassing errors now. The sports coverage is worse than that in most small town papers. He likely has no interest in addressing the biggest problem, the almost comical liberal bias that undermines its credibility.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

People my age, ie old, regard reading the newspaper as something you do every morning like brushing your teeth. Young people do not. We had some 20 something relatives staying with us, and every morning they were on their IPhones throughout breakfast. The Wash Post was there on the table, and they ignored it. They didn't seem to know what to do with it.

I saw a report saying what a great deal this was for Bezos and how he could make it financially successful by putting content behind a paywall. Seriously? They can't give it away now but people are going to pay? Do you think that idea might have occurred to the paper's former owners?

Bezos is on the wrong side of a major demographic trend here. He could spend a bit of money and vastly increase the abysmal quality of the Post. They fired all the editors and proofreaders. so it is filled with embarrassing errors now. The sports coverage is worse than that in most small town papers. He likely has no interest in addressing the biggest problem, the almost comical liberal bias that undermines its credibility.
I'm old too, AAA. But I don't know when I've last read a newspaper. I used to love having breakfast and coffee in the morning and read the paper. Now, I'm like your relatives. If my computer isn't in my lap, I'm messing with my iPhone. Same with the wife. When we go to breakfast or dinner, we don't say much, just look at our smart phones.

I don't know what Bozo is going to do with a newspaper. Maybe he has some bright idea no one else has thought about. Some papers have already put their stories behind a firewall. When I go to a site, even the WSJ, and the story is behind a firewall I just move on. Somewhere it is free if you really want to read about it. Just do a Google search.

The Dallas Morning News every now and then starts throwing the daily paper in my yard every day for a month or so. I just gather them up and throw them in the trash. Same with the yellow pages everyone puts on my doorstep. Right in the trash.

The only way I can see this password access to read their papers working is if they form a consortium. You pay one monthly fee and you have access to dozens of newspaper sites. It would have to be a small fee and a very large number of major papers in the consortium to get people used to paying for the news. Of course, there had better not be any advertising on the pages.

But, Bozo probably doesn't have a clue and he has so much money he can throw a measly $250M down a rat hole. I just wish he had thrown some of it my way. :D
 
I wouldn't pay. There are so many free sites now. The legacy print media doesn't have any kind of special access or insight.

The Post and NYT do retain the ability to decide what is newsworthy for the rest of the media and to kind of direct them in the correct way of thinking about an issue.

As for Bezos, I think this is just a rich guy toy, like a jet or big yacht. It will get him access to places that just being another internet zillionaire might not. Someone may have deluded him into thinking this was a socially important thing to do, or it will make him look like a Big Thinker. Who knows.

Bloomberg had a story yesterday basically with industry insiders mocking him for way overpaying. He paid abov emarket for a wasting asset.

The big downside I see for him is he could be tainted if it totally blows up, which I see as very possible. Then people begin to question his judgment on other things, like maybe running a company that never makes any money but levitates on a vision.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

...The legacy print media doesn't have any kind of special access or insight...
And for the most part their reports are yesterday's "news".
 
It's just an interesting question: given what Bezos has done up to this point, what can he do with the Washington Post? Maybe he will include a digital subscription with an Amazon Prime membership LOL. I'm interested to see what his editorial bias will be.
 
Quote from maxpi:

It's just an interesting question: given what Bezos has done up to this point, what can he do with the Washington Post? Maybe he will include a digital subscription with an Amazon Prime membership LOL. I'm interested to see what his editorial bias will be.
Liberal, of course.

<a href=http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Bezos-contributions-Democrat-Washington-Post/2013/08/07/id/519168><b>Bezos Leans Heavily Democratic</a></b>
 
Back
Top