How do you define nothing?
How would we know there was ever nothing without there being something?
How would we measure nothing?
Would you measure it in the Morning or the Afternoon?
Right @KGTrader4
Was there ever nothing?
- Thread starter easymon1
- Start date
How would we know there was ever nothing without there being something?
How would we measure nothing?
Would you measure it in the Morning or the Afternoon?
Right @KGTrader4
Well, you can't measure nothing, because it would require something to measure it with. That something negates the ability of there being nothing. Like how you can never be sure there is a temperature of absolute zero and why it is a theory, because that is effectively no temperature at all. But the only way to measure temperature is with a device that has molecules in motion. Ergo, you cannot have absolute zero.
Everything becomes logical if one thinks it's just a simulation.
If one can make such a simulation, then why not make millions of it with slightly differing initial variables --> multiverse.
This is the most logical explanation of this fking universe
The creators offer also an API for us to detect and use, but we have not been able yet.
The API allows for example teleportation to anywhere, even to the remotests galaxies.
But of course everything has a price label as the company behind it needs to generate profits...
We are just one of the civilizations, there are many more, most are much advanced than we.
We are at the moment insignificant for their galactic scale.
If one can make such a simulation, then why not make millions of it with slightly differing initial variables --> multiverse.
This is the most logical explanation of this fking universe
The creators offer also an API for us to detect and use, but we have not been able yet.
The API allows for example teleportation to anywhere, even to the remotests galaxies.
But of course everything has a price label as the company behind it needs to generate profits...
We are just one of the civilizations, there are many more, most are much advanced than we.
We are at the moment insignificant for their galactic scale.
Last edited:
Exactly.
In the beginning, God{prepared ,formed , fashioned and } created the heavens + the earth. Genesis 1;1 AMPC.
That also tells me God existed, before he created.
I know that's true because God saved me, healed me + answered so many prayers...................................................................................................
Everything becomes logical if one thinks it's just a simulation.
If one can make such a simulation, then why not make millions of it with slightly differing initial variables --> multiverse.
This is the most logical explanation of this fking universe
The creators offer also an API for us to detect and use, but we have not been able yet.
The API allows for example teleportation to anywhere, even to the remotests galaxies.
But of course everything has a price label as the company behind it needs to generate profits...
We are just one of the civilizations, there are many more, most are much advanced than we.
We are at the moment insignificant for their galactic scale.
I agree. If it's not hard to make one simulation, then it's not hard to make many. At one extreme, there might be a parallel universe which reflects each major decision a human might make. If so, one person, expressed as many thousands, might be experiencing hellish conditions in one universe, while the same person might be experiencing heavenish (but not actual heaven) conditions in a parallels universe. Arguably though, not each is experiencing the center of attention, dictating the center of experience. In which case the challenge would be to center the attention on the best experience. I suggest there is a way to do this depending on what attitudes one wishes to adopt, how one wants to view the world, and whether those attitudes and viewpoints reflect reality. The very fastest way to move from the worst to the best is through knowledge, but again, one might need to adjust attitudes and viewpoints to get to knowledge. With full knowledge, one would not have any experience of parallel universi at all. Knowledge presents a very different kind of universe, which is unified, therefore, no parallels.
In what i've described then, arguably, there isn't anything that is actually happening, except the movement of one's attention. Theoretically, each parallel has a scripted outcome. This is why it might not help to vote for the right political candidate to improve one of the parallel. It would be a better expenditure of energy to move one's own center of attention to a better universe. Better to take charge of one's own destiny.
Last edited:
They should just switch to matzoh. After all, Jesus was a Jew. Or do all these nuns still suck Constantine's spiritual cock and deny this?