Was Churchill anti-Semitic?

[Publisher]

Quote from acronym:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribbentrop-Molotov_Treaty

Wiki has its moments, but you need to remember its all someone's interpretation.

Revisionist history, edited by revisionist historians.......based on the contemporary versions of what contemporary historians and journalists were forced to write, or allowed to write, assuming the version they had had been "cleared" by higher channels, with overwhelming agenda's.

There is a good book about this subject called Stalin, Hitler, and Europe 1939-1941: The Imbalance of Power. It was written by James E. McSherry an America WW 2 vet, historian and state department employee during the Eisenhower years.

In November of 1940 Molotov went to Berlin to discuss an alliance. Molotov listed out Soviet terms which were:

1.)Provided that the German troops are immediately withdrawn from Finland, which, under the compact of 1939, belongs to the Soviet Union's sphere of influence. At the same time the Soviet Union undertakes to ensure peacefil relations with Finland and to protect German economic interests in Finland (export of lumber and nickle).

2.) Provided that within the next few months the security of the Soviet Union in the Straits is assured by the conclusion of a mutual assistance pact between the Soviet Union and Bulgaria, which geographically is situated inside the security zone of the Black Sea boundaries of the Soviet Union, and by the establishment of a base for land and naval forces of the USSR within range of the Bosporus and the Dardanelles by means of a long term lease

3.) Provided that the area south of Batum and Baku in the general direction of the Persian Gulf is recognized as the center of aspirations of the Soviet Union

4.) Provided that Japan renounces her rights to concessions for coal and oil in Northern Sakhalin.

Basically Hitler agreed with all but number 2. It became something of an issue . It seems that there was a legitimate attempt to work out a deal bringing Russia into the Axis. Hitler didn't want them gaining control of any other European countries and the negotiations fell apart.

Hitler basically came to the same conclusion as Napoleon. England is hoping to open up a second front by getting the Russians involved on their side. If we wipe Russia out England will lose all hope of victory and sue for peace.

 

[Publisher]

Quote from acronym:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribbentrop-Molotov_Treaty

Wiki has its moments, but you need to remember its all someone's interpretation.


Revisionist history, edited by revisionist historians.......based on the contemporary versions of what contemporary historians and journalists were forced to write, or allowed to write, assuming the version they had had been "cleared" by higher channels, with overwhelming agenda's.

Here is a Part of "14 Days That Saved the World", an essay by Paul Ballard that summarizes what Adolf Hitler saw, and what he did, in the summer days of 1941 while Stalin was amassing and positioning a huge offensive assault force along the western borders:

"Some of the (Ukrainian grain) money was spent on the thirteen fortified regions which were built along the Soviet Union's western frontier, in a strip of territory unofficially called the Stalin Line. A complex system of combat and supply installations, armoured and built of concrete, was constructed along the 30 - 50 km deep zone; there were also reinforced underground premises to serve as storage depots and command posts.

The fortified regions were built with enormous effort and vast expense during the first two Five Year plans. In 1938 it was decided to reinforce each region by building heavy artillery carponiers. More than a thousand combat installations a year were concreted into the region.

In 1939 the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was signed. Once Poland had been partitioned, there was no longer a neutral buffer zone. Stalin could have ordered the garrisons on the line to be strengthened and additional belts of fortified zones could have been constructed behind and in front of the existing line. But in fact the existing fortified regions were dismantled. Some military buildings were handed over to collective farms for vegetable storage, but most were buried or dismantled. In the spring of 1941 powerful explosions thundered along the 1200 km line as armoured firing positions were blown up.

The reason was simple: Stalin had decided to spread Bolshevism westwards, and the belt of fortifications would have blocked supply routes, creating dangerous bottlenecks for the millions of tons of ammunition, food supplies and fuel needed for the offensive.

Only a week after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed, Stalin played his first dirty trick. Hitler began the war with Poland as they had agreed, but Stalin stated that he was not yet ready.

Hitler found himself on his own, and immediately at war with France and Britain as well. Meanwhile, Stalin marked the conclusion of this "non-aggression" treaty by introducing military service.

A new "defensive" line was started in partitioned Poland, but although constructed very slowly and visibly, it remained a comparatively light and uncompleted series of fortifications. Mines were removed from the vicinity of bridges, and mile after mile of barbed wire was cut. Unnecessary bridges across rivers on the new frontier remained intact, and later greatly aided the German advance.

In the spring of 1941, the Germans began similar preparations. Both sides erected offensive fortifications. Before launching an attack, great masses of troops would have to be concentrated in very narrow sectors, German troops in the Suwalki and Lyublin salients, and Soviet troops in the area of Lvov and Bialystok. In order to assemble these shock groupings, the secondary sectors were denuded of troops - the lightweight fortifications prevented them from being completely exposed.

By 1941, as the last obstacles to the Red advance were removed, the Soviet Union possessed thirty separate armies, the largest military force the world had seen, and one which could not be maintained for long without mass starvation. The plundering of neighboring countries would have been the only means of paying for and justifying the existence of such a force.

Many of the best armies were not deployed to fight the Germans, but to invade virtually defenseless neutral states, as Stalin had already done throughout eastern Europe. The 9th army was concentrated on the frontier with Rumania; an assault crossing of the Danube was planned by its 14th Rifle Corps. The 12th and 18th "mountain armies" were positioned to move southwest along the Carpathian mountains to cut Germany off from the Ploesti oilfield in Rumania, and west into Czechoslovakia, which would enable Stalin to cut the Rumania-Germany oil pipeline. Without this irreplaceable Rumanian oil, the tanks, lorries, submarines, battleships and planes which were massed far away in the west would simply grind to a halt.

The seven armies in the Second Strategic Echelon included many thousands of men who had been released from concentration camps that spring to expiate their "guilt" by fighting for the Soviets. The generals and officers were also usually former political prisoners and were desperate to prove their worth. Their lives and those of their families were at stake. They were known as the "Black Divisions" because many still wore their black Gulag uniforms. The most powerful of the Second Echelon armies was the 19th, which was transferred from the North Caucasus to approximately 150 km north of the Black Sea. It contained mountain rifle divisions which could only be used in Rumania.

They were making their way to the frontier when Germany invaded.

They were not alone. In the final preparations for the attack on the West, millions of soldiers were still heading for the front in trains. Very often their ammunition and heavy weapons were being transported separately. Huge supply dumps were stockpiled just a few miles from the German lines. Most of the airforce was similarly exposed.

For a few critical days, Stalin's mighty invasion machine was incapable of defending itself.

Stalin believed he had convinced Hitler that the Soviet Union was truly neutral and assumed the Germans were busy finalizing an invasion of Britain. Hitler's conquests had created an unprecedented situation in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg, Yugoslavia, France, Greece and Albania. Their armies, governments, parliaments and political parties had been destroyed. Stalin's huge armies were in an ideal position to take over Europe, but Hitler guessed Stalin's design so that even in 1945 the Soviets got only half of Europe, and some territory in Asia.

At a Politburo meeting on 21st June 1941 G.R.U. (Military Intelligence) chief general Golikov reported that there was a massive concentration of the German airforce on the Soviet border, enormous reserves of ammunition and a regrouping of German forces.

He even knew the name of the operation - Barbarossa."

 

[Publisher]

The sources given in "14 Days That Saved the World" appear credible to me. Another good source is the book Stalin's War of Extermination by Joachim Hoffmann, long-time (Jewish) historian at the Research Department for Military History of the German Army, considered the most qualified specialist in Soviet military history in Germany. In chpter two, Hoffmann assembles a mountain of documented evidence which demonstrates that a Soviet invasion of Europe was imminent in June, 1941 -- a fact wellknown to the Germans. I can print here only a few excerpts:

Mobilization

>(page 61): As for secret mobilization, Soviet troops in the western border regions, in accordance with the new mobilization plan MP-1941 goda, received orders from the General Staff of the Red Army to prepare for full mobilization by June 1941.(n19) The date indicated for all troops and installations of the western special military districts was June 15, 1941; for that of the Baltic special military districts, June 20, 1941. The mobilization of the troops was to be prepared "down to the last detail" in accordance with the date established in the deployment scheme. The General Staff apparently wished "to take a resolute step forward" in June, and also to actually carry out a general mobilization. In the meantime, Stalin rejected a similar proposal by Timoshenko and Zhukov on June 14, 1941, since mobilization would automatically mean the opening of hostilities, which should, in the opinion at that time, begin with a surprise blow at a point in time chosen by the Soviets. The measures already taken, as Colonel Filippov recently showed, had been so effective that mobilization was not even necessary.(n20) In May 1941, Stalin ordered the call-up of a further 800,000 reservists, so that approximately 300 divisions were now ready.

>(page 62): As with the secret mobilization, the secret concentration of troops under cover of training camps was largely completed. Soviet historians, precisely to prove alleged Soviet peaceful intentions, have adduced a system of "decentralized camp exercises". In reality, however, the General Staff had, once again under the strictest secrecy, shifted four armies from the interior of the country to the border region as early as May 13, 1941, on Stalin's instructions. These armies were followed by others in June. The armies in question were the 16th, 19th, 20th, 21st, 22nd, 24th, and 28th, i.e. a total of seven armies, as well as the 21st and 23rd Mechanized Corps and the 41st Infantry Corps. These huge troop movements were conducted under the umbrella of denials inspired by Stalin....Otherwise, large units would hardly have appeared before the German army eastern front in numbers that, according to the enemy situation report of Panzer group 4 of August 10, 1941, amounted to 330 Soviet divisions, but, according to the intelligence report on the enemy of Panzer Group 3 of August 3 to 7, 1941, amounted to as many as 350 Soviet divisions.(n23)

>(pages 63-4): The secret concentration of the Soviet Air Forces, the development of the ground organization, and the organization of the rear support services were already almost entirely finished on June 22, 1941. The General Staff of the Red Army had concentrated "the most combat-ready aviation attack formations" in all previous air war history, in "the immediate vicinity of its national borders," and, to this end, had installed a dense network of operative airports in the area since early 1941....

Military Supply Build-up

>(page 64): Clear offensive intentions were also revealed by the transfer forward of all material resources of the armed forces that were stationed immediately adjacent to the western national borders. Gigantic depots of ammunition, weapons, equipment, fuel, provisions, and other stores and material, in fact all mobilization supplies, were, as Colonel Danilov has stated, installed practically in the effective range of enemy fire--even railway tracks were ready for use.(n29) For example, in Brest-Litovsk alone, the Germans captured ten million liters of fuel....

Operational Maps in hands of troops

>(page 65): The maps supplied to Red Army troops are another infallible indication of large-scale offensive plans. At various places near the border, as well as far behind the lines, the Germans captured maps extending far to the west and into German territory, as well as equally copious documentation providing other information on Germany. Such map discoveries were made at Kobryn, Dubno, Grodno, and many other places.(n33) In October 1941, the German XXIV Panzer Corps captured a map of Lithuania and East Prussia, as well as "an apparent operational study entitled 'Attack on East Prussia'"(n34) As the XXXXVIII Panzer Corps reported on July 1, 1941, the citadel of Dubno contained

"warlike-packed supplies of map materials drawn up for divisional tasks. These maps covered territory west of the border regions as far as the region of Cracow [in German occupied Poland]...large quantities of exercizes for general staff officers and lecture documentation on Germany were also found."(n35)

Wargames offensive, not defensive

>(page 66): Soviet aggressive intentions are also indicated by the fact that war-game map maneuvers, staff exercises, and the like were fundamentally offensive and aggressive in nature. Even at the division level, described by the First Ordinance Officer of the 87th Infantry Division, First Lieutenant Filipenko, "attack was practiced almost exclusively, with the support of artillery and combat vehicles"; "defense only rarely, up to company strength at most."(n44) On May 24, 1941, German radio reconnaissance in the border area near Grodek "with certainty" listened in on a Soviet exercise with the participation of tank units called "attack on land N," meaning Germany.(n45) Lieutenant Colonel Kovalev(n46), initially the commander of the 223rd Infantry Division, and, until May 1941 a student at the Military Academy of Moscow, and Captain Pugachev(n47), First Ordinance Officer on the Staff of the 11th Mechanized Corps, described the war games at the Army level, which exclusively involved the right wing (West Front) of the Soviet offensive front, but that already provide an introduction to the extent of the profound operations that were to be brought about according to the General Staff Plan of May 15, 1941...[Herefollows specific offensive plans.]

Preparation of Soviet troops

>(page 78): The "Plan for the Political Protection..." gave the political workers of the 5th Army exact instructions about their duties during the forthcoming offensive operations. The extensive propaganda preparations even included the publication of newspapers ("number of copies for the first few days, in Germany: 50,000") as well as leaflets for both German soldiers and the Polish population. Suitable leaflets for "enemy troops," "the content of which is to conceal our intentions while exposing the imperialistic plans of the enemy, and inciting German soldiers to disobediance," were already being prepared in large numbers even before the outbreak of the war. Thus it was not surprising that[ such leaflets were captured ] as early as the first day of the war--June 22, 1941.

>(pages 80-1): There are innumerable corresponding testimonies [of psychological preparation of troops for invasion] from the initial phase of the war. On June 30, 1941, the IV Army Corps, for example, reported:

"Prisoner of war interrogations repeatedly show that the political Commissars have spoken about forthcoming attacks on Germany. With the mention that Germany has been weakened by its struggle against England."(n85)

According to the testimony of an unnamed Air Force Lieutenant on July 17, 1941: "It was considered an open secret that the Red Army would attack Germany."(n86)...Dr. Kotliarevsky, a military officer called up for forty-five days service with the 151st Medical Battalion of the 147th Infantry Division beginning on May 30, 1941, stated on Sept. 24, 1941:

"On June 7, the medical personnel were assembled, and were told in confidence that there would be no more releases at the expiration of the forty-five days, since there would be war with Germany in the very near future."(n88)................

 

[Publisher]

Testimony of high-ranking Soviet officers

>(pages 83-5): Nor is it any accident that Soviet Commanders and Staff Officers who, after all, were not just exposed to a massive propaganda campaign, but were also, at least to some extent, entrusted with the present situation of the war preparations, expected an initiation of hostilities between July and September 1941. Captain Krasko, Adjutant of the 661st Infantry Regiment of the 200th Infantry Division, declared, for example, on July 26, 1941: "In May 1941, among the officers, the opinion was already expressed that the war would begin right after July 1."(n98) Major Koskov, Commander of the 24th Infantry Regiment of the 44th Infantry Division, testified:

"In the view of the Regimental Commander, the justification--namely the evacuation of the western Ukraine, 'because the Soviets were allegedly attacked without preparation' was in no way true, because Soviet military preparations had been underway for some time, and, in accordance with the extent and intensity of these preparations, the Russians would have attacked Germany of their own accord in two to three weeks at the latest."(n99)

(I omit the quoted testimony of six other Soviet officers who specifically testify to an expectation of a Soviet offensive during this period.)

On September 11, 1941, Major General Malyshkin, at that time Chief of Staff of the 19th Army, made a similar statement to Field Marshal Ritter von Leeb, remarkably accurate in its indication of numbers: "that Russia would have attacked Germany in mid-August with approximately 350-360 divisions."(n105) Note should be taken in this regard of Colonel Tokaev, Chief of the Aerodynamics Laboratory of the Air Force Academy in Moscow who, with reference to the Commissar of War, General Klokov, stated the following at an early date:

"The Politburo expected the Soviet-German war to start in very early August. That was the time that Stalin and Molotov considered most favorable to attack their friends Hitler and Ribbentrop."(n106)

A Russian historian

>(page 88): Finally, the Russian historian M. Nikitin should be mentioned who made a detailed analysis of the objectives of the Soviet leadership during the decisive months of May and June 1941. He summarized his research findings in the following words:

"We once again repeat that the fundamental objective of the USSR consisted of expanding the 'Front of Socialism' to the greatest possible territorial extent, ideally to include all of Europe. In Moscow's opinion, circumstances favored the realization of this scheme. The occupation of large parts of the continent by Germany, the protracted futile war,...[etc.]--all these factors were thought to give the Soviet leadership a unique chance to smash Germany by surprise attack...

A study of the guiding documents of the Central Committee of the VKP, in Nikitin's view, "together with the data on the immediate military offensive preparations of the Red Army...unequivocally proves the intention of the Soviet leadership to attack Germany in the summer of 1941."

 

[Publisher]

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Jews 'partly responsible' for their troubles: Churchill

Mar 10 7:08 PM US/Eastern

The Second World War prime minister Winston Churchill argued that Jews were "partly responsible for the antagonism from which they suffer" in an article publicised for the first time Sunday.

Churchill made the claim in an article entitled "How The Jews Can Combat Persecution" written in 1937, three years before he started leading the country.

He outlined a new wave of anti-Semitism sweeping across Europe and the United States, which was followed by the deaths of millions of Jews in the Holocaust under the German Nazi regime.

"It would be easy to ascribe it to the wickedness of the persecutors, but that does not fit all the facts," the article read.

"It exists even in lands, like Great Britain and the United States, where Jew and Gentile are equal in the eyes of the law and where large numbers of Jews have found not only asylum, but opportunity.

"These facts must be faced in any analysis of anti-Semitism. They should be pondered especially by the Jews themselves.

"For it may be that, unwittingly, they are inviting persecution -- that they have been partly responsible for the antagonism from which they suffer."

The article adds: "The central fact which dominates the relations of Jew and non-Jew is that the Jew is 'different'.

"He looks different. He thinks differently. He has a different tradition and background. He refuses to be absorbed."

Elsewhere, Churchill praised Jews as "sober, industrious, law-abiding" and urged Britons to stand up for the race against persecution.

"There is no virtue in a tame acquiescence in evil. To protest against cruelty and wrong, and to strive to end them, is the mark of a man," he wrote.

The article was discovered by Cambridge University historian Richard Toye in the university's archive of Churchill's papers.

At the time, Churchill's secretary advised him it would be "inadvisable" to publish it and it never saw the light of day.

Churchill was voted the greatest Briton ever in a nationwide poll held by the BBC in 2002.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/03/10/070311000812.7mxzo1k0.html

The personality of Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill could very well be a subject of interest to an alienist who, by definition, is a physician who treats mental disorders. There is a saying that the world is governed with very little sense and there are times when one could add to this statement that it often has been governed by lunatics.

Churchill was born in 1874 and died in 1965. His father was Randolph Spencer-Churchill, a son of the Duke of Marlborough. The first Duke was John Churchill, one of England’s most capable military commanders, who died without male issue in 1722 and the title was given to one of his nephews, a Spencer. As a courtesy, the Spencer family was allowed to add Churchill to its name, separated by a hyphen. Winston always wanted to believe that he was a gifted military leader in the mold of the first Duke but his efforts at generalship were always unqualified disasters that he generally blamed on other people. This chronic refusal to accept responsibility for his own incompetent actions is one of Churchill’s less endearing qualities.

Randolph Churchill died early as the result of rampant syphilis that turned him from an interesting minor politician to a pathetic madman who had to be kept away from the public in the final years of his life. His mother was the former Jennie Jerome, an American. The Jerome family had seen better days when Jennie met Randolph. Her father, Leonard, was a stock-market manipulator who had lost his money and the marriage was more one of convenience than of affection.

The Jeromes were by background very typically American. On her father’s side, Jennie was mostly Irish and on her mother’s American Indian and Jewish. The union produced two children, Winston and Jack. The parents lived separate lives, both seeking the company of other men. Winston’s psyche suffered accordingly and throughout his life, his frantic desire for attention obviously had its roots in his abandonment as a child.

As a member of the 4th (Queen’s Own) Hussars, in 1896 Churchill became embroiled in a lawsuit wherein he was publicly accused of having engaged in the commission of “acts of gross immorality of the Oscar Wilde (homosexual) type.” This case was duly settled out of court for a payment of money and the charges were withdrawn. Also a determinant factor was the interference by the Prince of Wales with whom his mother was having an affair.

In 1905, Churchill hired a young man, Edward Marsh (later Sir Edward) as his private secretary. His mother, always concerned about her son’s political career, was concerned because Marsh was a well known homosexual who later became one of Winston’s most intimate lifelong friends. Personal correspondence of March, now in private hands, attests to the nature and duration of their friendship.

Churchill, as Asquith once said, was consumed with vanity and his belief that he was a great military leader led him from the terrible disaster of Gallipoli through the campaigns of the Second World War. He meddled constantly in military matters to the despair and eventual fury of his professional military advisors but his political excursions were even more disastrous. Churchill was a man who was incapable of love but could certainly hate. He was viciously vindictive towards anyone who thwarted him and a number of these perceived enemies died sudden deaths during the war when such activities were much easier to order and conceal.

One of Churchill’s less attractive traits, aside from his refusal to accept the responsibility for the failure of his actions, was his ability to change his opinions at a moment’s notice.

Once anti-American, he did a complete about-face when confronted with a war he escalated and could not fight, and from a supporter of Hitler’s rebuilding of Germany, he turned into a bitter enemy after a Jewish political action association composed of wealthy businessmen hired him to be their spokesman.

Churchill lavishly praised President Franklin Roosevelt to his face and defamed him, with the ugliest of accusations, behind his back.

We owe a thanks to Mr. Eliot Roosevelt, stepson of FDR, to learn that fellow zionists FDR and H. Morgenthau had no respect for him. But hence, Winston, corrupt as he was, was "their man" in Downing Street No.10.

 

[Publisher]

Quote from traderNik:

Huh?? Is it rubbish or isn't it?

Sheesh.

He helped Zionism, and in 1937 he tried to help Jews by writing "How the Jews can combat persecution". More here. He wrote that Jews "have been partly responsible for the antagonism from which they suffer." Obviously, to suggest that Jews have misbehaved is anti-Semitic. We must say that Jews are flawless, and all their problems are due to anti-Semites. Churchill was mentally ill, like most Zionist puppets, not anti-Semitic, as you can see here and here. Judicial-inc has this and this on Churchill

 

[acronym]

Strangely, you neglect to mention the fact that churchill, on his mother side was american, scarcely alluded to it-nor did you mention his books, or any of the content of his lecture tour of the usa, which he visited twice, BEFORE he became chancellor of the exchequer, prior to becoming prime minister.


Yes, its obvious he hated america, you fucking twat.

Piss off.

 

[Publisher]

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
vs. Hitler being allowed to continue. [/B]

How can you blame Hitler for winning a war that he didn't start? You don't have to be a Holocaust revisionist to accept the abundant amount of evidence that proves that Hitler didn't start the war. All there is for evidence supporting the opposite are some undefinable claims found in Mein Kampf, which where written when the bitter taste of WW1 was still in the Fuhrer's mouth.

Then, why would you support war against Hitler, but not against Stalin - who long betrayed Trotskyite principles, murdered many more innocents than Hitler did - even if the most royal Holocoastian estimates are correct, and was a tyrannical dictator acting under the veil of Marxism. Which, despite my distaste of the former, was less of a bloodthirsty ideology than the one practiced by Dzhugashvili.

With the above in mind. Don't you think that the least thing we can say is that we went after "the wrong enemy"?

 

[ZZZzzzzzzz]

No, I don't think we went after the wrong enemy.

The Allies defeated Hitler and Mussolini, and Tojo in Japan.

Could Stalin have been stopped?

Maybe, but what would a failure there have meant? There is no guarantee in war. To my understanding, Russia...as we know it...has never really been defeated in a war by an invading force. Pretty damn big country to think you can occupy and control.

Think nuking Moscow right after Hiroshima would really have done the trick?

I don't know about some Americans, they truly think we can rule the entire globe...

Quote from Publisher:

How can you blame Hitler for winning a war that he didn't start? You don't have to be a Holocaust revisionist to accept the abundant amount of evidence that proves that Hitler didn't start the war. All there is for evidence supporting the opposite are some undefinable claims found in Mein Kampf, which where written when the bitter taste of WW1 was still in the Fuhrer's mouth.

Then, why would you support war against Hitler, but not against Stalin - who long betrayed Trotskyite principles, murdered many more innocents than Hitler did - even if the most royal Holocoastian estimates are correct, and was a tyrannical dictator acting under the veil of Marxism. Which, despite my distaste of the former, was less of a bloodthirsty ideology than the one practiced by Dzhugashvili.

With the above in mind. Don't you think that the least thing we can say is that we went after "the wrong enemy"?

 

[Pa(b)st Prime]

Interesting.

Sounds as if you advocate might is right.

Since the Tri-Axis was "beatable" it was a worthy fight by the U.S.

Since Stalin was unbeatable it's proper that we fought his enemies.

If one were to list Russia, China, Italy, Japan and Germany on a list, how would you categorize them in order of human rights, military oppression, social mores, justice ect.

My guess would be Russia (enemy of the Tri-Axis) and China (enemy of Japan) would top the list of "bad guys".

The nations that the U.S. and Britain fought would be on the "good guy" list.

Peculiar?

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

No, I don't think we went after the wrong enemy.

The Allies defeated Hitler and Mussolini, and Tojo in Japan.

Could Stalin have been stopped?

Maybe, but what would a failure there have meant? There is no guarantee in war. To my understanding, Russia...as we know it...has never really been defeated in a war by an invading force. Pretty damn big country to think you can occupy and control.

Think nuking Moscow right after Hiroshima would really have done the trick?

I don't know about some Americans, they truly think we can rule the entire globe...