It may not be enough if we're still importing from OPEC and have to act as peacekeeper in perpetuity.We are already a net exporter of oil.....
It may not be enough if we're still importing from OPEC and have to act as peacekeeper in perpetuity.We are already a net exporter of oil.....
I happen to think that ISIL,Levant,Boko, Hezzbo, etc. have more capability than the guy in Rikers.There are guys on Randalls Island that have grand ambitions. It’s the ability to implement those ambitions that counts and they were not very successful over many many years.
I was in the NYC. I was watching the towers burn from the Bear Steans trading floor in midtown Manhattan. A bunch of my friends died in the South Tower. So when I “spout shit” I know fair and well what I am talking about. The political establishment used this tragedy to rob us blind.
....?? We are a NET EXPORTER.It may not be enough if we're still importing from OPEC and have to act as peacekeeper in perpetuity.
There are guys on Randalls Island that have grand ambitions. It’s the ability to implement those ambitions that counts and they were not very successful over many many years.
I was in the NYC. I was watching the towers burn from the Bear Steans trading floor in midtown Manhattan. A bunch of my friends died in the South Tower. So when I “spout shit” I know fair and well what I am talking about. The political establishment used this tragedy to rob us blind.
About trading? What are you talking about? I said it was a tragedy and that politicians used it as a pretext to crank up the military spending.Really? You are going to equate 9/11 with political ambitions about trading? Ug!
So in place of increased military/intelligence readiness, what would you propose in dealing with groups with the stated objective being the destruction of the west ?About trading? What are you talking about? I said it was a tragedy and that politicians used it as a pretext to crank up the military spending.
It does not have to be an all or or nothing reaction. It’s a scale ranging from doing nothing and allocating a meaningful portion of the GDP, I think the right answer lies with some sort of cost/benefit analysis. Obviously, that’s not what happened.So in place of increased military/intelligence readiness, what would you propose in dealing with groups with the stated objective being the destruction of the west ?
I think you are correct in a utopian situation, but a cost/ benefit anal of fighting terrorism will never be easy in an open society...anyway Happy New Year to all !It does not have to be an all or or nothing reaction. It’s a scale ranging from doing nothing and allocating a meaningful portion of the GDP, I think the right answer lies with some sort of cost/benefit analysis. Obviously, that’s not what happened.