You are the one bitching to the mods. Put him on ignore, make your appeal in Feedback, whatever, just stfu bitching to the mods.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Warming is over as El Nino fades - Models failing.
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
You are the one bitching to the mods. Put him on ignore, make your appeal in Feedback, whatever, just stfu bitching to the mods.
Now you are accusing me of bitching to the mods, eh? Have any proof or evidence? Maybe you need to understand that mods do keep an eye out for abuse of the forum even in P&R.
Let's get back to the subject at hand. Do you have any proof or evidence that jem posted something a hundred times? If he did then I am sure that you should communicate with him that this is not appropriate.
That's not the subject at hand. You started this:Let's get back to the subject at hand.
"Futurecurrents has posted his list of organizations well over 100 times. This is abusive to the forum. He has been told multiple times by moderators to stop doing this. When is he going to to stop? It is abusive to the forum."
That is the "subject at hand".
That's not the subject at hand. You started this:
"Futurecurrents has posted his list of organizations well over 100 times. This is abusive to the forum. He has been told multiple times by moderators to stop doing this. When is he going to to stop? It is abusive to the forum."
That is the "subject at hand".
Incorrect - the subject at hand is your false accusation regarding jem. Let me remind you -
"And jem has posted his "CO2 cools" report re the NASA Sabre a hundred times."
At minimum you should be factual and truthful in your accusations about others on the forum and back it up with evidence.
Well if you're going to use a reply to say the subject changed, then the subject at hand has changed to "subject at hand".Incorrect - the subject at hand is your false accusation regarding jem. Let me remind you -
"And jem has posted his "CO2 cools" report re the NASA Sabre a hundred times."
Take your appeals to the Feedback forum, where they belong.
Search, google, string = "is there a scientific consensus on climate change 2016"
Result:
https://www.google.com/search?num=4......1c..64.serp..3.1.186...0i22i30.t76bcMyOAWk
Result:
https://www.google.com/search?num=4......1c..64.serp..3.1.186...0i22i30.t76bcMyOAWk
Search, google, string = "is there a scientific consensus on climate change 2016"
Result:
https://www.google.com/search?num=4......1c..64.serp..3.1.186...0i22i30.t76bcMyOAWk
So still no evidence from the ET Search function that jem posted something a hundred times, eh?
You are the one bitching to the mods. Put him on ignore, make your appeal in Feedback, whatever, just stfu bitching to the mods.
What a baby he is. He is getting all frustrated by having to see what the experts say. He would prefer to stay ignorant and deluded. What a putz.
actually moron... that means I figured out the chart by eyeballing it. It was last years chart because this year is not over.
This year's final tally could still be up... . but it could be down looking at that monthly drop... I will bet you 1000 dollars to our favorite charity that 2017 will be lower than last year or this year if we look at the "unadjusted data".
2. as far as predicting that spike... I warned that the el nino would cause the warming on these threads in 2015. Many of the scientists at that time stated if el nino kicks in we will likely go to new highs.
By the way science shows tides (at least in part) are what drives some or much of the warming on these charts...
What drives the oceans temps... a lot of it is the el nino la nina cycle. (and probably underground volcanoes and sun) .
Finally, I have study el ninos and la ninas since I moved to California in the late 80s. I use to volunteer my time for clean water groups. I have tracked el ninos since the 80s... My good friend who was fairly well known long boarder and shaper wrote a book on surf forecasting and tides in the 80s. He covered this stuff back then. el ninos impacting the ocean is not a new idea to those who love the ocean.
.
This year's final tally could still be up... . but it could be down looking at that monthly drop... I will bet you 1000 dollars to our favorite charity that 2017 will be lower than last year or this year if we look at the "unadjusted data".
2. as far as predicting that spike... I warned that the el nino would cause the warming on these threads in 2015. Many of the scientists at that time stated if el nino kicks in we will likely go to new highs.
By the way science shows tides (at least in part) are what drives some or much of the warming on these charts...
What drives the oceans temps... a lot of it is the el nino la nina cycle. (and probably underground volcanoes and sun) .
Finally, I have study el ninos and la ninas since I moved to California in the late 80s. I use to volunteer my time for clean water groups. I have tracked el ninos since the 80s... My good friend who was fairly well known long boarder and shaper wrote a book on surf forecasting and tides in the 80s. He covered this stuff back then. el ninos impacting the ocean is not a new idea to those who love the ocean.
.
It's yearly data, all you had to do was click on the NASA link.
You really don't understand what you're posting. I doubt the models had predicted that recent spike. Eyeballing regression lines through the data would still point upward.
Answer this: At the end of the year, will the mean temperature anomaly of 2016 be higher or lower than that of 2015 ? (No one in their right mind would say lower.)
I was too harsh, over the top, on this thread, in my replies to you, gwb. I apologize. You have a good weekend.So still no evidence from the ET Search function that jem posted something a hundred times, eh?