Yes, and every post was a steaming pile of horseshit. Full of impressive verbage but ultimately wrong. Just like this latest horseshit about "bad models".
Warming hoaxers now reject IPCC report
- Thread starter fhl
- Start date
Yes, and every post was a steaming pile of horseshit. Full of impressive verbage but ultimately wrong. Just like this latest horseshit about "bad models".
My date was off, but he did say it.
http://scienceline.org/2008/12/ask-rettner-sea-level-rise-al-gore-an-inconvenient-truth/
Dude... (said for effect) when you put a person on ignore but still flame with ad homs for weeks on thread after thread... week after weak week.
I can see trolling out an insult once or twice even though the other person is not participating in that thread with you. But, to make a habit of it, its just so low on the manly chart. In fact its not even on the chart... its the manifestation of true internet weak douchebagery.
All this started because slarti was pretending to be engaged in serious conversation about man made co2. When I showed him there was no peer reviewed science showing man made co2 causes warming. (outside of now failed models) he said he would do some research and get back to me. Instead of getting back to me... He put me on ignore and started on his campaign of big douchery.
I can see trolling out an insult once or twice even though the other person is not participating in that thread with you. But, to make a habit of it, its just so low on the manly chart. In fact its not even on the chart... its the manifestation of true internet weak douchebagery.
All this started because slarti was pretending to be engaged in serious conversation about man made co2. When I showed him there was no peer reviewed science showing man made co2 causes warming. (outside of now failed models) he said he would do some research and get back to me. Instead of getting back to me... He put me on ignore and started on his campaign of big douchery.
Yes, he never said that sea levels would twenty feet higher by now. He gave no time at all. The "when" part is very important. Small detail.
Again, the mistake was yours and that of other people that get their science from Fox News.
Ok, fine. I used to work in I.T. and I'm accustomed to musings based on little fact on possible causes of fault or flawed methodology. What I've never done is state anything but provable facts to a client, other than outline areas of testing etc.
The boys don't have a clue, they don't have a clue that they don't have a clue. Socially I would tend to agree with you a lot however.. I just sense something wrong here. These ultra long marathon discussions on the same subject, over and over? That is not how an expert carries on.
My niece is a relatively recently qualified ecologist, she is quite an expert in artificial intelligence. If they are using AI for a lot now, the old 80s models are getting very dusty. A new thing is happening now I am told. Could be pretty cool (or an awful lot hotter).
Last edited:
He said "near future" and you said "NOBODY" ever said that. My information was slightly incorrect. Your information was TOTALLY incorrect. But that's what happens when you get your science from CNN.
Wow you are confused. No one ever said that sea levels would be twenty feet higher now. Not Gore or any scientist. You said he did. He didn't. You are wrong not him. Try facts sometime.
So why did Trump say that earth would be frozen by now? Why? lol
Last edited:
First off all, I only asked a question, so YOU are wrong, not me. I never stated anything as fact or said he said anything. I simply asked if he said sea levels will rise 20 feet by 2014. That's the problem with you liberals. You don't know how to listen.
Try some facts sometime.
OK, I can play that retarded game also. Didn't Donny Dumbo (the current prez) say that he would grabbed every pussy in the US by now?