As I said, if you accept that a big part of his secret equation dealt with 8.6 years, it is easy to convince yourself of its truth by simply overlaying vertical lines every 8.6 years on a long term plot of Gold or markets and see if it coincides at all with any major turning points in the last several decades since he has been away. I would highly doubt it.
I know a lot of followers get offended by casting doubts, but again, he left enough evidence to test that major premise, IMO.
Regarding his success, I can't say about him personally, but I've seen a lot of people ascribing success to Pretcher, who had many false calls that were easily falsifiable.
Incidentally, you can add every 4.3 years (1/2 cycle) to the
Armstrong Economics 8.6 yr review set to get...
turning points.
"1934.05" "B"
"1938.35" "T"
"1942.65" "B"
"1946.95" "T"
"1951.25" "B"
"1955.55" "T"
"1959.85" "B"
"1964.15" "T"
"1968.45" "B"
"1972.75" "T"
"1977.05" "B"
"1981.35" "T"
"1985.65" "B"
"1989.95" "T"
"1994.25" "B"
"1998.55" "T"
"2002.85" "B"
"2007.15" "T"
"2011.45" "B"
"2015.75" "T"
"2020.05" "B"
..take it as you will. But I also thought he called the 87 inflection point on a dime? Yet, on their website they only mention that 89 called the Japanese inflection point?