This is my twitter....I agree 100%; considering the likelihood of the guy being white.
www.twitter.com/seantcarter
Hardly white....
This is my twitter....I agree 100%; considering the likelihood of the guy being white.
Damn leap after all the shit you say on here now you want restraint in the conversation. Has somebody hacked your account? Don't understand the soft erotica about your girlfriend but I approve.
."... Jiu Jitsu is more important to me than getting my IFBB card.

Guess who's got a black belt in Gracie Jiu Jitsu.... Ed O'neil... TV's Al Bundy and now of Modern Family! Said it took him 17 years to earn it.
Yes, there's a piece of it, thanks Lucrum!
Look at Federal aid (GenRev fund). The 2010 IRS data disputes it and blames it squarely on urban vs. rural demo. Urban areas are in a surplus while rural are in deficit.
Red states were more likely to get a bigger cut of federal spending. Of the 22 states that went to McCain in 2008, 86 percent received more federal spending than they paid in taxes in 2010. In contrast, 55 percent of the states that went to Obama received more federal spending than they paid in taxes. Republican states, on average, received $1.46 in federal spending for every tax dollar paid; Democratic states, on average, received $1.16.
This red-blue split may be partly explained by the difference between urban and rural states. Red states are more likely to be rural, and rural states were more likely to receive more federal spending than they paid in taxes in 2010. Among predominantly rural states, 81 percent received more federal spending than they paid in taxes. In contrast, 44 percent of urban states received more federal spending than they paid in taxes. Rural states, on average, received $1.40 in federal spending for every tax dollar paid; urban states, on average, received $1.10. (Rural states are defined as states whose urban population rate is below the national average of 79 percent.)
So the inner city isn't to blame? How do you reconcile that it's not inner-city blacks?
STC, maybe you can respond in full sentences when you take a break from your "financier" gig and attempting to sell your trading station.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/11/states-federal-taxes-spending-charts-maps
Yeah, I know it's MJ. What GOP site would publish such damning info?
The assertions made in the Mother Jones article below are absurd and have been completely debunked in multiple in-depth studies. Mother Jones is merely playing games with statistics with total disregard for accounting standards involving government expenditures (or in other words - they are totally misapplying amounts to red states that are actually sent to blue states - such as 80% of crop subsidies)