it kinda confuse me the difference between fundamentals and technicals , technicals feel a bit superficial , like an experience approach based on strange laws , i dunno if they are proved mathematically correct laws , fundamentals is a heavy logic and mathematic approach which would probably make it harder to learn but more rewarding. I find technical approach more fun though.
Both can be spurious.
Both can be valuable, at time.
There is no law in trading. No theorem.
It's more like a battle. When to attack ? To fold ?
One thing is to Max your Upside, Min your downside.
To trade what's here above all. Not what we think or should be.
Find patterns, plan for likely scenarios. Cut Losses, Leverage Gains...
Statistics / Probability & Programming IMHO are the only useful tools.
There is the underlying (Price) and your derivative (strategy).
Don't try to fit (Overfit?!) the underlying into your strategy.
My strategies have an A Priori which is to be Convex.
Then I study the underlying & see what I can do.
Experiments, Trials & Errors, Statistical Analysis.
Backtest, Run Simulations, Forwardtest.
Last edited:

