R RCG Trader May 19, 2013 #11 Quote from pspr: Are you really that naïve? He answers you OP claim in the negative with three sentences. How more relevant could it be? More... Charles Barkley's friends do not exactly constitute a sample size, now do they?
Quote from pspr: Are you really that naïve? He answers you OP claim in the negative with three sentences. How more relevant could it be? More... Charles Barkley's friends do not exactly constitute a sample size, now do they?
Lucrum May 19, 2013 #12 Quote from RCG Trader: Charles Barkley's friends do not exactly constitute a sample size, now do they? More... roughly 13% of the US population.
Quote from RCG Trader: Charles Barkley's friends do not exactly constitute a sample size, now do they? More... roughly 13% of the US population.
P pspr May 19, 2013 #13 Quote from RCG Trader: Charles Barkley's friends do not exactly constitute a sample size, now do they? More... That wasn't the question dumbass. The question was relevance. Your OP hypothesis was blown out of the water before we got to that post anyway.
Quote from RCG Trader: Charles Barkley's friends do not exactly constitute a sample size, now do they? More... That wasn't the question dumbass. The question was relevance. Your OP hypothesis was blown out of the water before we got to that post anyway.
