Wall Street Rule for the #MeToo Era: Avoid Women at All Cost

Let's be respectful. Yes, some women are much more attractive than others, but I would not refer to any woman as an "ugly fat pig".

Ok. You're right. I wouldn't want to hear that if I happen to be an unattractive woman.

Unfortunately, I can't edit the original post anymore as the time for edit has expired.
 
Ok. You're right. I wouldn't want to hear that if I happen to be an unattractive woman.

Unfortunately, I can't edit the original post anymore as the time for edit has expired.

You can send a message to a moderator here, they will edit for you if you ask.
 
In modern times, ugly fat pigs have an edge over gorgeous babes in the workplace. Male bosses feel safer with ugly fat pigs and will be more willing to spend time with them.

Just because they are ugly fat pigs that doesn't mean they are necessarily immune from harassment, might not be sexual harassment although men's taste in women can be quite diverse; they might still receive harassment in the forms of taunting, bullying, jeering and etc. and according to the long list of definitions that @Sig has posted, they all qualify as sexual harassment. Besides when all else fails, this catch-all definition of "discomfort to the point of not able to work" will certainly nail the guy for sexual harassment.

Conclusion: Ugly fat b****es are not safe.
 
Ok. You're right. I wouldn't want to hear that if I happen to be an unattractive woman.

Unfortunately, I can't edit the original post anymore as the time for edit has expired.

Don't worry, everything is in the eyes of the beholder. :)
 
Just because they are ugly fat pigs that doesn't mean they are necessarily immune from harassment, might not be sexual harassment although men's taste in women can be quite diverse; they might still receive harassment in the forms of taunting, bullying, jeering and etc. and according to the long list of definitions that @Sig has posted, they all qualify as sexual harassment. Besides when all else fails, this catch-all definition of "discomfort to the point of not able to work" will certainly nail the guy for sexual harassment.

Conclusion: Ugly fat b****es are not safe.

If calling someone an ugly fat pig is sexual harassment, someone needs their head examined what they find sexual. Ugh! :p

Harassment and bullying is really enough, sexual or not. Everything ain't sexual between genders. In a civilized society, I believe someone should then get a chance to redeem themselves, not one of the worst punishments immediately: Exclusion, even without trial or proof.

I don't think people get excluded immediately just for some bullying, so why should sexual harassment get special treatment? Both depend on circumstances. Good leadership do not just confront the parties, but actively find constructive solutions where diversity and tolerance of differences in people can happen, bad behaviour marginalized.
 
Last edited:
If calling someone an ugly fat pig is sexual harassment, someone needs their head examined what they find sexual. Ugh! :p

"Calling me "ugly fat pig" has caused me discomfort to the point that I can't work anymore so that's harassment because I feel harassed and I am a woman so that's sexual so I feel that's sexual harassment" that's what she would say to HR, to twitter, to FB, to anybody and there you go. She's part of the #MeToo!! She's the victim of sexual harassment. LOL The thing is she can twist it however she likes and there is nothing that men can do anything about it. And I suspect that companies are willing to lean towards the woman because if they are paying the woman 30% less than the man for the same job, why pay more to keep the man if they are going to save more money especially if the man is fired for cause they don't even have to pay severance.

I better run before @Sig asks me to name an example...
 
"Calling me "ugly fat pig" has caused me discomfort to the point that I can't work anymore so that's harassment because I feel harassed and I am a woman so that's sexual so I feel that's sexual harassment" that's what she would say to HR, to twitter, to FB, to anybody and there you go. She's part of the #MeToo!! She's the victim of sexual harassment. LOL The thing is she can twist it however she likes and there is nothing that men can do anything about it. And I suspect that companies are willing to lean towards the woman because if they are paying the woman 30% less than the man for the same job, why pay more to keep the man if they are going to save more money especially if the man is fired for cause they don't even have to pay severance.

I better run before @Sig asks me to name an example...

You know real life is not like those news headlines, right?
 
I don't think people get excluded immediately just for some bullying, so why should sexual harassment get special treatment?

Identity politics, general bullying is not specific to certain political identities.

Because sexual harassment happens mainly to women it has been elevated to the same level as racism by the feminists who are playing identity politics and want to grab more power for women at the expense of men.
 
Last edited:
You know real life is not like those news headlines, right?

Not in news headlines but I am sure it's happened to people irl given the current practice of "fire first, investigate later" approach that companies take right now regarding sexual harassment allegations.
 
Back
Top