Wall Street Rule for the #MeToo Era: Avoid Women at All Cost

If the man is below her standards then even the slightest bit of flirting is unwelcome and considered harassment.
But if he is meets or exceeds her standards the exact same things are very welcome.

A good looking Hugh Mungus is more desirable. Lol ha
 
If the man is below her standards then even the slightest bit of flirting is unwelcome and considered harassment.
But if he is meets or exceeds her standards the exact same things are very welcome.

Depends on energy. Some are blessed with high karisma, other need to work for it. Then the women may eye or seek you. If low and less pure energy, you might attempt coping-tactics that fail you, trying too hard and not able to meet others' energy levels. Attraction could end in friendship, another possibility that require higher energy, broader perspectives and tolerances.
 
In modern times, ugly fat pigs have an edge over gorgeous babes in the workplace. Male bosses feel safer with ugly fat pigs and will be more willing to spend time with them.

Let's be respectful. Yes, some women are much more attractive than others, but I would not refer to any woman as an "ugly fat pig".
 
Only Rosie O'Donnell, however I would never use the word pig to describe anything because I find it to be racist, don't you?
 
although in my experience if you're a stand-up guy it's pretty certain even in government that you'll be quickly cleared and your accuser punished in this type of situation

So what you're saying is that it has nothing to do with the truth but how you are perceived. Must work great for the blacks.
 
reads like butthurt BS made up by MGTOW'er incels.

Some of it yes, but some of it is very much based on personal experience. I was brought up blue pill in the sense that my mother was good to me, so why wouldn't every woman be like that? I shared my experience because I'm not afraid. I look like a "thug" and I embrace it, so when these things happen, I do have to fight hard because whitey wants to keep me in check.

The end result is what I'm after.
 
There is a huge difference between ..."to protect themselves in the face of what they consider unreasonable political correctness..."

and men being charged with a crime that could label them a sex offender for life.

Do you not understand the severity and gravity of what is going down, man?

ANY woman can now take down any man with a false charge of sexual assault, defined as, well, what is it defined as? A WINK FROM ACROSS THE STREET, because it makes them feel uncomfortable and open to attack.

And if convicted, you are a felonious sex offender. Your life is ruined. All for winking at a woman.


Sadly, I have to agree with Overnight. The definition of sexual assault is 'any unwanted sexual contact.' ANY! What if it's a hug, meant completely platonically? Or a gentle hand on the shoulder? Or an overlong handshake? If the aggrieved party interprets it as 'unwanted sexual contact,' then it is! And bang - you're guilty, your job is gone, your rep is ruined. And you may face criminal charges. It's actually happening to some men.
I'm glad I'm not in that world.
 
Back
Top