VP debate over,Benghazi-gate will continue

next 2 debates will focus more on foreign affairs (one debate exclusively) so this will not go away any time soon. More shit will emerge before Tues and the final one on the 2nd
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

I don't think this one is going away.




His best bet is to pin it on hillary.
More...

I've been wondering about that pretty seriously the past few days. The so called "cover up" has been exaggerated by the GOP for sure. They are calling this the biggest cover up in history. That is nonsense. How about a little perspective time and again.

In this case, so far there hasn't been any perjury. Did the administration knowingly present a false narrative to the public? Yes, that is almost not debatable at this point and Romney is going to do a much better job of hanging that around Obama's neck than Ryan could. But that is not even in the same league as some other things in history. They didn't use a false narrative to start a war. They didn't do it to cover money laundering or supplying weapons to our enemies.

The most plausible explanation is that they did it to fit a weakened enemy image that they had constructed. There have been no criminal acts yet. A false media narrative is not illegal it is just unbecoming.

The real question I've had is whether they will try to throw Clinton under the bus, and then whether she will let them. My first inclination is a YES to the former and a NO to the latter.
 
Quote from Epic:

I've been wondering about that pretty seriously the past few days. The so called "cover up" has been exaggerated by the GOP for sure. They are calling this the biggest cover up in history. That is nonsense. How about a little perspective time and again.

In this case, so far there hasn't been any perjury. Did the administration knowingly present a false narrative to the public? Yes, that is almost not debatable at this point and Romney is going to do a much better job of hanging that around Obama's neck than Ryan could. But that is not even in the same league as some other things in history. They didn't use a false narrative to start a war. They didn't do it to cover money laundering or supplying weapons to our enemies.

The most plausible explanation is that they did it to fit a weakened enemy image that they had constructed. There have been no criminal acts yet. A false media narrative is not illegal it is just unbecoming.

The real question I've had is whether they will try to throw Clinton under the bus, and then whether she will let them. My first inclination is a YES to the former and a NO to the latter.
More...
I wouldn't hang my hat on the no perjury thing.
The official inquires are just getting started.

But the lies are already on videotape.
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

If Romney does a good job of explaining what happened and obama's lies, then attacks obama's UN speech: It's over for the obama administration.
More...

An analysis of the logical and grammatical structures of the above sentence reveals the level of education/IQ of its writer.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/13/u...for-president.html?nl=us&emc=edit_cn_20121012

There were more questions that came out last night because the vice president directly contradicted the sworn testimony of State Department officials,” Mr. Romney said at a rally in Richmond, Va., on Friday morning. “He’s doubling down on denial. And we need to understand exactly what happened, as opposed to just having people brush this aside. When the vice president of the United States directly contradicts the testimony, sworn testimony, of State Department officials, American citizens have a right to know just what’s going on, and we’re going to find out.”
More...

rut-roh, :D :D
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

If Romney does a good job of explaining what happened and obama's lies, then attacks obama's UN speech: It's over for the obama administration.
More...

+1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top