Volume Based Charts Request for HELP

Quote from brownsfan019:

John - 'give and take' is NOT acceptable in volume share bars. I'm not paying for charts that are 'kind of 'accurate when other services do exactly what I need.

I called TS directly and they do NOT support constant volume bars. And it can be altered by as much as 30%+.

See my initial pic - one bar on the 500 EC chart is actually at 680 - that's 130 over my threshold. That is unacceptable and will not work.

At this point it looks like Multi is the best option as you can easily import Easy Language into it.

Well you see my chart it looks level enough to me. Not sure why yours is off so much.

It doesn't matter which chart you use anyway. People who claim otherwise are either trying to sell your something or don't know any better.

John
 
Quote from Allmighty1:
People who claim "it doesn't matter" don't know their ass from their elbow.

True constant volume charts stabilize the trading environment in a way that no other chart does. Properly used (on the proper scale) they allow the trader to see price movement without all the noise. If you were to take a moment and pull your head out from its current resting place, you could see that price will hesitate or bounce at places where it is going to establish a high or low. About the only place to see this is with a CV chart

Thanks Allmighty, took the words from my mouth. :D
 
Quote from jficquette:

Well you see my chart it looks level enough to me. Not sure why yours is off so much.

It doesn't matter which chart you use anyway. People who claim otherwise are either trying to sell your something or don't know any better.

John

Of course,
accuracy is highly overrated, (the drug companies would love that philosophy)
consistency is worthless (pro athletes would love this being the norm)
and environments that are variable are better than those that are constant. (This is why they are trying to develop a specific golf course where the hole is constantly in a state of flux.)

Common sense is highly overrated as well as you can tell from some of the statements in this thread.
 
Back
Top