In general, the investment/trading community equate volatility to risk, at least to first order.
Two questions for you:
1. Do you agree?
2. Over most 3 decades windows, QQQ > SPY. Does it mean the more volatile QQQ is not really higher risk?
In general, the investment/trading community equate volatility to risk, at least to first order.
Two questions for you:
1. Do you agree?
2. Over most 3 decades windows, QQQ > SPY. Does it mean the more volatile QQQ is not really higher risk?
OK. So volatility can be opportunity, what is risk in your view? Can you profit from risk?I see volatility as opportunity not risk.
Is Markowitz correct?two basic definitions of risk:
1. Markowitz : volatility = risk
2. Graham and Dodd : permanent impairment of capital (a loss isn’t coming back)
2. Over most 3 decades windows, QQQ > SPY. Does it mean the more volatile QQQ is not really higher risk?
Is Markowitz correct?
OK. So volatility can be opportunity, what is risk in your view? Can you profit from risk?

I think QQQ had a 83% drawdown in the last 3 decades. While SPY was around 50%.
QQQ is higher reward and also higher risk
