Quote from Martinghoul:
It's the volatility of volatility, not dvega/dvol...
In some stochastic vol models (e.g. SABR), it's a parameter used to quantify the "steepness" of the smile. If vol of vol is high, wings are very expensive. That may be where you're getting your fly reference.
Forget dvega/dvol, that's an effect, rather than a cause...Quote from erasmus:
So basically because deep otm calls/puts have positive dvega/dvol, they will benefit from volatility being volatile itself (ie. as vols go higher you make progressively more and lose progressively less when vols come off) , which isn't the case for an ATM as you always have constant vega exposure (dvega/dvol 0). This why being long fly is being long vol of vol, is that right?
Do you know where i can read up more about this?
I have found that people confuse two terms when talking about vol of vol. For example, the definition given above as vol-of-vol to me and probably the quantitative world is the correct one: it means the price of wings and in particular the slope of the skew/smile/smirk. So it is possible for the ATM options not to move at all, but the wings to get more expensive or cheaper. In other words, curvature.Quote from erasmus:
What is exactly meant by the term 'vol of vol' ? Is it the same as dvega/dvol?
I have read that to be long a butterfly is to be long 'vol of vol'. Can someone elaborate on this more please?
Thanks