Are you using the index itself or the VIX futures as the underlying?
In that cause you should be able to use Black76 as a model unless you're doing something fancy like trying to extract relative value.I guess the VIX futures. From a pricing point of view you need to replicate the option with the underlier and since in this case the index is not directly trade-able, you need futures in replication. So I expect a pricing model to take this into account.
In that cause you should be able to use Black76 as a model unless you're doing something fancy like trying to extract relative value.
thats not gonna work. is your Google broken?In that cause you should be able to use Black76 as a model unless you're doing something fancy like trying to extract relative value.
Dude, you are being childish. I know you love fancy models but you also have to understand that practical applications do not require them most of the time.thats not gonna work. is your Google broken?
I won't argue with that, you are right.Dude, you are being childish. I know you love fancy models but you also have to understand that practical applications do not require them most of the time.
Like any futures, VIX futures contract is a martingale under Q measure. So you totally can use Black76 model to price and risk-manage options on VIX futures, as long as you understand the limitations of the vol-of-vol numbers. Granted, the deltas are going to be a bit wacky because of the jumps included in the vol and you have to be mindful of the vol ramp-up (a.k.a the Samuelson effect). However, simply using black volatilities backed out of the market prices and applying some simple rule of thumb corrections is going to be sufficient for most applications, including market-making.
... underlier returns are not log-normal. Tried fitting a Black-Scoles to it and was completely off, of course. So question is what is it?