Vivek Ramaswamy

TreeFrogTrader said:
Yeah, your ilk are definitely hard at work getting me and others to pay for your school via the student loan forgiveness scam.

Thanks for rubbing it in. You are right, I will be paying for your school unless the Court does the right thing.

Let's see what Vivek has to say about that. It won't be pretty.
More...

So im not exactly sure what happens if the student loan debt forgiveness were to hold up. Those funds were already appropriated and spent. So no added debt. Probably a slight reduction in treasury inlays but im not sure if the student loan program isolates that money either, even though I doubt it.

Either way the fact that you think you’ll be paying for something and that is the cause of your resentment is absolutely perfect and on par.
 
UsualName said:
So im not exactly sure what happens if the student loan debt forgiveness were to hold up. Those funds were already appropriated and spent. So no added debt. Probably a slight reduction in treasury inlays but im not sure if the student loan program isolates that money either, even though I doubt it.

Either way the fact that you think you’ll be paying for something and that is the cause of your resentment is absolutely perfect and on par.
More...

You dems specialize in grifter schemes.
 
UsualName said:
Grifter schemes:

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/
More...

Oh, I see.

You are comparing the dems attempt to impose government schemes on to taxpayers to Trumps request for voluntary contributions. You might want to work on that argument a bit before taking it out on the road.

If the dems are able to get skin color reparations or student debt scams enacted is that going to be "voluntary" as to whether other citizens have to support it? I may have missed that part.

FAIL ON STEROIDS. STAND DOWN FOR A WHILE AND LET THE KOOL AID LEVELS RISE IN YOUR SYSTEM. YOU ARE OFF YOUR GAME.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Oh, I see.

You are comparing the dems attempt to impose government schemes on to taxpayers to Trumps request for voluntary contributions. You might want to work on that argument a bit before taking it out on the road.

If the dems are able to get skin color reparations or student debt scams enacted is that going to be "voluntary" as to whether other citizens have to support it? I may have missed that part.

FAIL ON STEROIDS. STAND DOWN FOR A WHILE AND LET THE KOOL AID LEVELS RISE IN YOUR SYSTEM. YOU ARE OFF YOUR GAME.
More...

Nope. I simply pointed to a true grift. Just like I pointed out you won’t be paying for anything. You are the one who keeps saying silly things and needs correction. But I get it you don’t get it so you just keep going expressing your general grievances even though there is little to no basis. Which begs the question if you have no reason to be resentful for these things why are you so morose?
 
UsualName said:
Nope. I simply pointed to a true grift. Just like I pointed out you won’t be paying for anything. You are the one who keeps saying silly things and needs correction. But I get it you don’t get it so you just keep going expressing your general grievances even though there is little to no basis. Which begs the question if you have no reason to be resentful for these things why are you so morose?
More...

Y'all see the kool aid financing scheme the Comrade tries to explain to me and then says I don't get it?

Heh. The argument is that because the loans have already been made and the supporting funds enacted so to cancel repayment does not create any burden on taxpayers.

Yeh right. Other than the fact that the planned revenue receipts are gone now so to the extent that that would have applied to other government expenses, the taxpayers must now cough up elsewhere. Having already coughed up once for the original loans that are now with the colleges.

Commienomics. Shell Game 101.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Y'all see the kool aid financing scheme the Comrade tries to explain to me and then says I don't get it?

Heh. The argument is that because the loans have already been made and the supporting funds enacted so to cancel repayment does not create any burden on taxpayers.

Yeh right. Other than the fact that the planned revenue receipts are gone now so to the extent that that would have applied to other government expenses, the taxpayers must now cough up elsewhere. Having already coughed up once for the original loans that are now with the colleges.

Commienomics. Shell Game 101.
More...

Tour taxes aren’t going up, if you even pay any.
 
UsualName said:
Tour taxes aren’t going up, if you even pay any.
More...

It was/is money that was due back into the public coffers that will not arrive back there.

Whether taxes go up or not, is neither here nor there in regard to whether it is a loss to taxpayers. Taxes may - for example- not go up because revenue is received from other sources or because congress cut other programs. It like having someone owe you 100,000 and not pay it and then tell you that you are no worse off because you made an additional 100,000 recently. Ah, no.

Stick with your Funny Money Dem accounting. It is what your ilk does.

Remember the Infrastructure Bill where Pelosi and Watters and your ilk kept trying to market it by saying "it cost you nothing because it has all paid for." Meaning that they were proposing to enact taxes with it so it in fact nets out and costs nothing. Can't make this sh#t up. More Dem "accounting."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top