Not per capita.
UK is going to win this one.
Currently we are at 100,000 US deaths equivalent.
Spain, France and Italy are still ahead of us, but not for long.
Last edited:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Virus Eradication Not Possible?
- Thread starter apdxyk
- Start date
Not per capita.
UK is going to win this one.
Currently we are at 100,000 US deaths equivalent.
Spain, France and Italy are still ahead of us, but not for long.
Not per capita.
UK is going to win this one.
Currently we are at 100,000 US deaths equivalent.
Spain, France and Italy are still ahead of us, but not for long.
Fwiw Belgium is still first, but read today them counting suspicious cases in care homes might increase Belgium numbers compared to other european countries
Not per capita.
UK is going to win this one.
Currently we are at 100,000 US deaths equivalent.
Spain, France and Italy are still ahead of us, but not for long.
If there rest turn out like NYC and NYC isn't just a fluke, then you've definitely got this.
India is your biggest threat, few nukes, remove ??
Fwiw Belgium is still first, but read today them counting suspicious cases in care homes might increase Belgium numbers compared to other european countries
Why numbers are low over the weekend, they don't add care home numbers, then inflate any low days over the week. UK atleast!
Fwiw Belgium is still first, but read today them counting suspicious cases in care homes might increase Belgium numbers compared to other european countries
Apparently the UK is going to have 100,000 deaths by the end of year if we do a bad job removing lockdowns.
Thats would be an average of 330 deaths per day over the remaining days of the year.
Currently there we averaging 750 deaths per day in the UK.
Last edited:
Apparently the UK is going to have 100,000 deaths by the end of year if we do a bad job removing lockdowns.
Thats would be an average of 330 deaths per day over the remaining days of the year.
Currently there we averaging 750 deaths per day in the UK.
Apparently Southall believes everything he's told without question, he's a good PC.
Only about a 12% increase in deaths on the year. Most would of died this year anyway so likely 3% yearly increase ie nothing burger still.
If Sweden was increasing on deaths still I'd be worried about lockdowns being removed, but as they aren't, i think we can safely say unless the lockdown is really early and HARD ie Australia there is just no point.
And if you think Australia won't get it back time and time again till there forced to give up the your wrong.
But other than a pointless waste of time and money atleast in the UK we are still on herd plan with pointless lockdowns to appease the snowflakes.
Apparently Southall believes everything he's told without question, he's a good PC.
No i didnt believe it, that is why I started my post with the word 'Apparently'
However to entertain the idea i calculated how many deaths a day would be needed to get UK to 100,000 deaths by the end of year.
To my suprise it wasnt that many, only an average of 330 a day.
No i didnt believe it, that is why I started my post with the word 'Apparently'
However to entertain the idea i calculated how many deaths a day would be needed to get UK to 100,000 deaths by the end of year.
To my suprise it wasnt that many, only an average of 330 a day.
And I estimated the increased % deaths on the year then allowed for most being in a bad way anyway, and 3% being the actually yearly increase.
Thinking UK 35-40K so double, long slow wind down on the deaths.
%% Good points.And after testing 5.000 in a CA county. medical doctor said its like the seasonal flue= quarentine the sick NOT the well.WELL SAID...……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..Death Rate % = total number of covid19 deaths / total number of positive covid19 cases
1 covid19 death / 2 positive cases = 50% death rate.
1 covid19 death / 3 positive cases = 33% death rate.
1 covid19 death / 4 positive cases = 25% death rate.
etc etc etc
The numerator stays constant. The denominator is a big question mark, and waaaaaayyyyyy under-sampled. Why? No testing.
Numbers coming out of Chicago and LA County show 4-50% of the population already exposed. With mass, rapid testing, the death toll (numerator) remains same, while denominator grows exponentially =============
Drumrollllllllllll.........
Something about the same strength as a bad flu season.
O.2% death rate.
We're going to bankrupt America, the American way of life, and THROW IN THE TRASH, THE SACRIFICE OF MILLIONS OF AMERICANS WHO DIED FOR THAT FLAG, THEIR BLOOD, AND THEIR DESTROYED FAMILIES .......
for a 0.2% death rate.
(Hint: control the numbers = control the narrative).
About the extra deaths caused more by the panic than the coronavirus, some info that supports Turveyd 's claims in the UK of underused hospitals aNd non coromavirus patients suffering and dying at home. An issue already stressed in other countries. In Spain the hospitals seem to get busy again since the worst of the panic is over, with people showing up in emergency rooms with non coronavirus ailments much later than they should have. Curious to see hoe many have died at home.The article also mentions how easily one s death can registered as a coronavirus death without a test done.
https://us.yahoo.com/lifestyle/coronavirus-covid19-excess-deaths-certificate-115827065.html
https://us.yahoo.com/lifestyle/coronavirus-covid19-excess-deaths-certificate-115827065.html
Last edited: