Why "filter" by economics? Why not by gender? Why is it any different assuming males pose a greater risk toward violence than arguing those with darker skin commit more crime?
My best guess Z? If one compared crime stats between middle class black and white neighborhoods the same discrepancies would occur. If money was an arbiter then athletes and rap stars would be shun criminal behavior. IMO it's more about culture than economics.
Liberals have long argued stats are skewed because whites are less likely to be convicted. I'd agree to some degree that's true although I doubt the average white armed robber is defended by F. Lee Bailey.
What's becoming truer recently is that black criminals are not being arrested as frequently as white criminals. Many cities are seeing the rate of cleared murders at all time lows. The white guy who kills his wife is arrested within days. The black guy who shoots a rival gang member is usually not identified or hence apprehended. Some criminologists believe black murderers are being under represented by as much as a third or half.
If economic discrepancies are to blame then why black on black crime? Or black crime in nations where NOBODY has any money? Do you think black criminals are bemoaning CEO compensation when they kill each other?
P.S. Define educational "opportunity." Is there a magic learning pill distributed to white kids? Surely you're hip to the immense spending per pupil in America's urban schools. Since funding isn't the issue could it be the teachers? Or is it racist to argue that perhaps whites have been historically better educators?
My best guess Z? If one compared crime stats between middle class black and white neighborhoods the same discrepancies would occur. If money was an arbiter then athletes and rap stars would be shun criminal behavior. IMO it's more about culture than economics.
Liberals have long argued stats are skewed because whites are less likely to be convicted. I'd agree to some degree that's true although I doubt the average white armed robber is defended by F. Lee Bailey.
What's becoming truer recently is that black criminals are not being arrested as frequently as white criminals. Many cities are seeing the rate of cleared murders at all time lows. The white guy who kills his wife is arrested within days. The black guy who shoots a rival gang member is usually not identified or hence apprehended. Some criminologists believe black murderers are being under represented by as much as a third or half.
If economic discrepancies are to blame then why black on black crime? Or black crime in nations where NOBODY has any money? Do you think black criminals are bemoaning CEO compensation when they kill each other?
P.S. Define educational "opportunity." Is there a magic learning pill distributed to white kids? Surely you're hip to the immense spending per pupil in America's urban schools. Since funding isn't the issue could it be the teachers? Or is it racist to argue that perhaps whites have been historically better educators?
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
I did not make your point at all. We can take any area of the country, and we will find crime by whites.
Your use of the term "virturally" crime free is what I object to...
Prison populations nation wide are not "virtually" all black and hispanic.
I don't argue that the percentage of crime by black are higher, but rather than apply racist conclusions that I find are so common here at ET, I am applying just scientific observation.
If we were to filter the crime results by economic status, say take only those who have incomes in the six digit realm or higher (no, not drug dealers...but law abiding businessmen) then analyze white to black, or white to hispanic, etc. the conclusion that I believe a rational non racial person would make is that poor blacks and hispanics are convicted of more crimes.
So, why is it that more poor blacks and poor hispanics are engaged in more crime per capita than whites?
This then becomes a sociological issue, not really one of race per say.
Then the solutions becomes a sociological solution, not a racial issue per say.
It is not that I don't think we have a problem, and no, I don't think that necessarily pouring money on the problem is going to fix the problem, and yes black and Hispanic community has to take the major responsibility.
But let's consider this. Imagine if we suddenly legalized drugs, legalized prostitution and made both affordable to the low income districts.
How would that impact crime statistics on the basis of race?
See, the issue really isn't not about race, it is about the condition and culture, the family history, etc. of the particular situations, and the socioeconomic conditions.
The growing disparity in income in this country, the lack of education and opportunity is what ultimately leads to crime...not race.