VIDEO: Police "shootout" with 12 and 14 year olds

I'm glad they didn't kill a police officer and then escaped in a vehicle...

They would have been put down in a much worst fashion at a later date in some sort'uv ambush or maybe after the police used a "pit maneuver" to stop them from fleeing (sarcasm).


wrbtrader
 
userque said:
GIRL: THE AK'S JAMMED OR SOMETHING!

BOY: YOUTUBE WHAT TO DO; WHILE I LAY DOWN COVER FIRE!

[7 minutes later]

More...

Fuck...

Even a 7 year old can learn how to use AK's from that video. :(

If the United States gets off its ass and ban that weapon...will Youtube then take down those AK Instruction Manual educational videos ?

wrbtrader
 
wrbtrader said:
Fuck...

Even a 7 year old can learn how to use AK's from that video. :(

If the United States gets off its ass and ban that weapon...will Youtube then take down those AK Instruction Manual educational videos ?

wrbtrader
More...
Maybe. But I'm sure such videos will remain elsewhere on the internet.
 
Tony Stark said:
This is one of the problems with US gun laws.So many owners are extremely careless.These idiots leaves AK 47s so insecure that a 12 and 14 year old can get into their house and take them.

There should be gun laws that gun owners have to check there guns in with law enforcement once a year.If any of there guns are missing they should be banned from owning guns for 5 years,lifetime ban for a 2nd offense.if a person cant keep their guns out of the hands of criminals they shouldn't be allowed to have them imo.
More...

There is so much fail in this thread I do not know where to start. We can start with this one.

So you are saying, Tony, that I must keep my firearms locked away in an inaccessible safe when I am not home?

K...What is wrong with this picture? You ever hear of the US Constitution? People who have broken into my home and stolen my guns are not liable for a crime, but I am because I allowed criminals to have access to the guns, when they broke in?

How does that even compute?
 
Overnight said:
How does that even compute?
More...

if a person cant keep their guns out of the hands of criminals they shouldn't be allowed to have them imo.


Its that simple.

I also forgot to add the lawful gun owner should be financially liable for any damages done with the gun they bought and allowed to get into the hands of someone it did not belong.
 
Tony Stark said:
if a person cant keep their guns out of the hands of criminals they shouldn't be allowed to have them imo.


Its that simple.

I also forgot to add the lawful gun owner should be financially liable for any damages done with the gun they bought and allowed to get into the hands of someone it did not belong.
More...

By that logic, gun stores cannot be allowed, because people can break into and burglarize gun stores. Fascinating logic.
 
Tony Stark said:
if a person cant keep their guns out of the hands of criminals they shouldn't be allowed to have them imo.


Its that simple.

I also forgot to add the lawful gun owner should be financially liable for any damages done with the gun they bought and allowed to get into the hands of someone it did not belong.
More...

This is similar to laws involving dog owners who has a dangerous dog that breaks out (escapes) a fenced yard and attacks someone in the neighborhood or off the leash in a yard in which the dog attacks a friend in the home...

The owner of the pet is liable...fines, imprisonment or both. At the minimum, the dog is put down and the fines and/or imprisonment occurs later for the dog owner.

It's absurd that we have laws like that for owners of pets but not for gun owners that are careless. Yet, some states have "leash laws" in which a dog that's off the leash and attacks someone...the owner is liable.

Note: Every state and country is different...minor penalties for some and harsh penalties for others in which owners can be arrested / convicted / imprison for the behavior of their dog.

wrbtrader
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top