Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

Let me just say stu...
I have been beating back dozens of your troll lies about science for years.

Sooner or later your are going to be correct on one these points just by pure troll luck or because it was something I had not picked up in the journals or articles while beating back your troll lies. At the same time... my knowledge in this field is growing... so when you make our lies up... I spot them much faster.
 
Quote from pspr:
Is that all you can do is repeat what I say like a parrot?

How stupid do you have to be to just go on like that? Are you 4 years old or have that mental capacity? It sure seems so.

Just because I see jem rip you a new one every time you open your mouth you just repeat what ever I say. Why don't you just say nothing? Then nobody would realize how immature and juvenile you are not to mention your lack of understanding.
More...

You show all the signs of being immensely dense. That's why you apparently see what you see and why I rather appropriately repeated your own words back at you.

What's the difference. You might as well argue with yourself. You have nothing to offer but retarded insult and they suit you.

Why don't you just relax ....go indulge your obsession disorder... start another 20 threads.
 
Quote from jem:

Stu you have turned into a comedy act.
Try a link to real science instead of troll bullshit.
You see susskind explaining the tuning to 120 decimal places on video and it does not enter your brain?

Where do you dream up your lies?
>>>>

...
"These hopes were shattered with the 1998

Blah Blah
More...
Religious websites are not science. They aim to confuse so that gullible goofs like you will fall for a godunnit horseshit explanation which is in fact, no explanation at all.

It is not known what the so called fine tuning number is , because there is not yet enough information to fix it. Possible values to 120 decimal places, which you are saying 'is spectacular fine tuning', but which scientist say only appears to be of that order, are arrived at by the same route multiverse is.

If multiverse is pure speculation which you say it is, then by exactly the same token so is 'fine tuning'. You though for no good reason, and certainly no science based one, say it isn't.

No one actually knows what the cosmological value is. Not Einstein, Susskind or Weinberg. They are scientists, honest enough to say so. You are merely dishonest enough to try and misrepresent that in any way you can.

You destroyed your own argument ages ago, simply because you don't have the basic intellectual capacity to understand you are contradicting yourself.
 
Quote from jem:

Let me just say stu...
I have been beating back dozens of your troll lies about science for years.

Sooner or later your are going to be correct on one these points just by pure troll luck or because it was something I had not picked up in the journals or articles while beating back your troll lies. At the same time... my knowledge in this field is growing... so when you make our lies up... I spot them much faster.
More...

You have been beating back science to make irrational conclusions just so you can remain in denial for years.
Your knowledge is growing Lol..don't make me laugh. Your knowledge in pseudoscience might be growing with all the religiously motivated horseshit you swallow.

Because you choose to misunderstand and lie about what is actually being said and explained, does not mean you are increasing knowledge. That's also something you've not been unable to grasp for years either.
 
Quote from stu:

You show all the signs of being immensely dense. That's why you apparently see what you see and why I rather appropriately repeated your own words back at you.

What's the difference. You might as well argue with yourself. You have nothing to offer but retarded insult and they suit you.

Why don't you just relax ....go indulge your obsession disorder... start another 20 threads.
More...
I'm not the fool who started this nonsense. You are the idiot that started calling people fools just because I pointed out that jem kicks your ass in this thread.

You couldn't argue your way out of a wet paperbag. You present no valid arguments. You present no data. You present no evidence. You don't even point out links to people who do have those things.

All you do is point out what jem has already said and the information he has provided. I doubt you even read the information at his links because you sound like a fool every time you try to say something.

You probably haven't even watched the video that is the OP of this tread.

You just repeated show the fine people reading this forum that you are an obnoxious fool who is missing the answers of life. You'll never get it.
 
Quote from VVV1234:

The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design

Guess who wrote it?
More...
Try to keep up. Look at the posts on page 39.
 
We have been arguing about the meaning of that book since it came out.

Stu once said that Susskind was not really saying the universe appeared designed.

He also said Susskind would never say God was one possible explanation.

That is why this video is so good.
It shows everything Stu has been saying for years was troll garbage.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2cT4zZIHR3s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

And after writing the book he explains it.
The universe appears fine tuned.

He suggests 4 explanations are possible for the knifes edge fine tuning in our universe.

One, God
Two, Multiverse
Three, luck (but he discounts that)
Four, perhaps some day they will discover a grand theory explaining the incredible tuning had to be this way..


Stu... you child... rather than produce the science for us, you make believe what that Susskind did not confirm what the website was telling you. Tuned to 120 decimal places...

I thought you said that our cosmological constant could be positive.

Your are a such a troll atheist you are now giving thoghtful atheists a bad name.



Quote from VVV1234:

The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design

Guess who wrote it?
More...
 
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/plpCfXKKYLE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3nl1rAEKMUA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top