Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
I get it... everyone who listens ( 4 posts above) to that video at the 6 minute mark really does not hear Susskind say God is of the 3 (4) possible explanations of the fine tuning.
I get it... you must be tuned into the tin foil hat guy 50s atheist channel.
The one that does not let science in.
I get it... you must be tuned into the tin foil hat guy 50s atheist channel.
The one that does not let science in.
Thing is you don't get it at all.
Only 1 of 4 possible explanations mentioned , is given an explanation. A possible explanation given no explanation is not an explanation.
Susskind gives no God explanation at the 6 min mark or anywhere else, leaving God along with 'accident' and 'who knows'.
Your delusion lets it in.
Only 1 of 4 possible explanations mentioned , is given an explanation. A possible explanation given no explanation is not an explanation.
Susskind gives no God explanation at the 6 min mark or anywhere else, leaving God along with 'accident' and 'who knows'.
Your delusion lets it in.
1. Caution this may be too difficult for Stu to grasp... if so move to the next section.
Stu is now requiring a string theorist to explain to him what?
how the Tuner tuned the universe?
And in so doing Stu just blundered into the argument I showed Stu from the Cardinal of the Catholic Church about 5 or 7 years ago on ET.
By speculating that the reason we are fined tuned is that everything happened in some universe or another... you are not really explaining how our universe was made or even works.
That is why the multiverse (landscape) speculation is used but not really liked by so many.
It answer no questions. The speculation leads to an unpredictable universe.
Therefore in response to that critique...
Hawking created his top down topology (the paper i keep presenting) and telling us we can predict because we are our universe behaves the way the Feynman sum of histories behaves. (how lucky is that?)
The multiverse is big pile of massive speculation.
2. Typical response for Stu...
Your are such a troll.
in your previous post you said...
"There is no God explanation in that or any other Susskind video you keep obsessively posting."
But..... now you are saying there was no explanation of the God explanation.
What do you want? Susskind to explain how the Tuner tuned the Universe. That would seem odd since he wrote the book on the multiverse / landscape conjecture.
Stu is now requiring a string theorist to explain to him what?
how the Tuner tuned the universe?
And in so doing Stu just blundered into the argument I showed Stu from the Cardinal of the Catholic Church about 5 or 7 years ago on ET.
By speculating that the reason we are fined tuned is that everything happened in some universe or another... you are not really explaining how our universe was made or even works.
That is why the multiverse (landscape) speculation is used but not really liked by so many.
It answer no questions. The speculation leads to an unpredictable universe.
Therefore in response to that critique...
Hawking created his top down topology (the paper i keep presenting) and telling us we can predict because we are our universe behaves the way the Feynman sum of histories behaves. (how lucky is that?)
The multiverse is big pile of massive speculation.
2. Typical response for Stu...
Your are such a troll.
in your previous post you said...
"There is no God explanation in that or any other Susskind video you keep obsessively posting."
But..... now you are saying there was no explanation of the God explanation.
What do you want? Susskind to explain how the Tuner tuned the Universe. That would seem odd since he wrote the book on the multiverse / landscape conjecture.
Not at all difficult to grasp. You're just rambling.
Your authority Susskind, gave no explanation for God, along with no explanation for 'accident'.
Science.... "is big pile of massive speculation" founded upon mathematical equations and based on the laws of physics.
God .... "is big pile of massive speculation" founded upon nothing but your own personal fantasies.
That's your so called argument.
Don't blame me because your silly non-argument "is big pile of massive bullshit".
Your authority Susskind, gave no explanation for God, along with no explanation for 'accident'.
Science.... "is big pile of massive speculation" founded upon mathematical equations and based on the laws of physics.
God .... "is big pile of massive speculation" founded upon nothing but your own personal fantasies.
That's your so called argument.
Don't blame me because your silly non-argument "is big pile of massive bullshit".
It makes no difference.
If it's science or multiverse or what Susskind or what Guth says, or it's what any of YOUR authority says .... "is big pile of massive speculation".... then it "is big pile of massive speculation" ...founded upon mathematical equations and based on the laws of physics.
God or Tuner then, also.... "is big pile of massive speculation".... but founded upon nothing else other than personal fantasies.
There is no science that confirms any fine tuning. There are values which are only asserted to be fine tuned. Fine tuning "is big pile of massive speculation".... founded upon nothing other than assumption.
You still have a non-argument which still "is big pile of massive bullshit".
Your obsession in troll posting the same videos over and over won't change that.
Might want to reflect on that a bit, since jem has taken you to task on it over and over again.
