Don't flush if you want to keep what little is left of your brains.
That's the thing with a closed mind like yours. You can't tolerate anything that questions it.
Some certainly don't learn much about basic humility in a monastery then.
Having outed yourself as gay , you were a gay what, monk or just a visiter for a year, in a monestry full of men, mingling with someone you think might be possibly deemed a saint ".
Good grief.
So which of those attributes make you so particularly narrow-minded enough to be driven towards the crude and emotional disorder most of your posts display.
Not "Engrish" pisspoor, wtf. Perhaps when you've sobered up you might avoid the confusion you have with reading.
The obsession in starting a dozen threads every day, day in day out, mustn't be helping you either, to get out of the delusion that youâve made something resembling a sensible statement.
Not going to be able to properly discuss much anyway when you've already reached conclusions despite the facts.
Yeah Jem... I debunked... your bullshit. You're making progress.
For all the spamming and incessant repetition of the same old videos, you still get debunked. The unscientific illogical dysfunctional claims you make on the back of them... get debunked.
It's because your claims are baseless bullshit so it's straightforward enough.
Hypocritical too, like most delusional god botherers are.
One minute youâre quoting scientists as truth personified, the next you're decrying them , demanding what they say is merely conjecture. Then claim it's me who is arguing against them. phttt.
That's the same delusion of thought your fellow religious thread spammers look to be impeded by.
You have no argument. Just a computer full of cobbled together vids conjured by more fanatical religious extremists ready to jump to conclusions despite the facts, and on which you cannot debate or even think straight.
That's a pretty shitty way of going about stuff.
But a little reassuring at least when you say I got it wrong about 'inflation and the landscape and the multiverse', although you've no idea how or why.
Coming from you, it's good enough confirmation quite the opposite will be true.
He said ....."Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. ...It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going."
..the He in that case being Stephen Hawking.
Funny how you like to use scientists in an appeal to authority, yet will only accept the ones as authority which you think are saying something you want them to say.
You delude yourself as being capable of arguing against Hawking's unambiguous statement which just goes to show the unfetterd hubris you have; but don't bother questioning anything of Susskind.
But then, non of the scientists is actually saying what you want them to say, and neither does the science anyway . Thatâs how sad your ridiculous ideas are.
Not a problem with what they say but with what YOU say.
