Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

show us the link to your study
show us how many returned the forms.

I am pretty sure this is bullshit like your 97% of agw nutters published in pro agw nutter journals are agw nutters.


Quote from futurecurrents:

You must have missed this part. Or intentionally left it out.

"the National Academy of Science charted belief in God as low as 5.5 percent among biologists and 7.5 percent among physicist and astronomers in a 1998 study."

Just like with AGW, the people who are the most expert in the subject closest to the question at hand are the most definitive and overwhelming in consensus.

Only a fool believes within their heart that there is a God. The whole concept is absurd and akin to belief in ghosts and Sasquatch.
More...
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:
Why don't you just slither on off to "atheist dweebs R US"?

It's all opinion anyway.
More...
In your opinion it's only opinion, and you obviously can't do with anything other than your own opinion.
 
Quote from stu:

1)In your opinion it's only opinion, and 2) you obviously can't do with anything other than your own opinion.
More...
1)Like I said that's just your opinion.

2) I've heard it all before and I really don't give a fuck if you believe or not so yeah, Save it for somebody who gives a crap about your mental gymnastics and everything else that goes with it.
 
Only 50% of the scientists in the nas returned their ballots...
where as the pew survey had a much higher response rate...

Plus I read that the survey was sent out with a memo from the NAS telling them NAS scientists should be atheists. (paraphrase.)


http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html


Because of the relatively small size of NAS membership, we sent our survey to all 517 NAS members in those core disciplines. Leuba obtained a return rate of about 70% in 1914 and more than 75% in 1933 whereas our returns stood at about 60% for the 1996 survey and slightly over 50% from NAS members [1,2].
 
you are off the deep end now.

you acting like one possible explanation by way of conjecture... by hawking that gravity could cause the universe in his hypothetical top down cosmology for real science by real scientists is the settled answered for the fine tunings...


you have not debunked shit... you just troll your deluded mind off.


Quote from stu:

How many times. I've debunked YOU and the batshit nonsense spun from their quotes . Try to get a hold of that and you might start to get a clue.

The only "Tuner" necessary is gravity. Your 'best minds in science' have told YOU in plain English that because there is gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing.

How come you have such a problem with a straight forward statement like that, but not with the ridiculous fantasized add-ons you keep trying to attach onto ambiguous expressions like the universe appears fine tuned.


"...the tuning of our universe...". So you've magicked it into fact now. Lol

Tuning?...then there already is evidence, scientific evidence no less, that gravity is your Tuner. Not god. No god necessary.

You have no argument. But then you never did.
More...
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

You must have missed this part. Or intentionally left it out.

"the National Academy of Science charted belief in God as low as 5.5 percent among biologists and 7.5 percent among physicist and astronomers in a 1998 study."

Just like with AGW, the people who are the most expert in the subject closest to the question at hand are the most definitive and overwhelming in consensus.

Only a fool believes within their heart that there is a God. The whole concept is absurd and akin to belief in ghosts and Sasquatch.
More...
:D :D

Trying to make scientists look like idiots I see:D :D .

Haven't you done enough of that with your constant proselytizing of AGW.
 
I think Stu and futurecurrents are so ignorant that they could be proof that God doesn't exist.

Oh, wait. Could it be that God gives us a few ignorant people so we will know what ignorance is and that it should be avoided?
 
Quote from stu:

How many times. I've debunked YOU and the batshit nonsense spun from their quotes . Try to get a hold of that and you might start to get a clue.

The only "Tuner" necessary is gravity. Your 'best minds in science' have told YOU in plain English that because there is gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing.

How come you have such a problem with a straight forward statement like that, but not with the ridiculous fantasized add-ons you keep trying to attach onto ambiguous expressions like the universe appears fine tuned.


"...the tuning of our universe...". So you've magicked it into fact now. Lol

Tuning?...then there already is evidence, scientific evidence no less, that gravity is your Tuner. Not god. No god necessary.

You have no argument. But then you never did.
More...

Was jem that guy behind the counter in the Dead Parrot sketch?

No, no he's just pining !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218&feature=player_detailpage#t=25s
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top