Quote from OldTrader:
Yeah, they claimed that wouldn't run 4 monitors, that it's actually 1 card with some type of toggle setup. He was kinda vague. LOL.
OldTrader
Quote from wareco:
Well, if your heart is set on the 290, then fine, but I agree with Gnome that the 64/128mb 285 card is more than adequate for about 1/4 the cost.
Quote from OldTrader:
Let's set aside the cost question for a second. This computer came with a 290 x16. So given that, would you recommend getting a 285 to run my other two monitors? If so, would the only factor in your decision be the cost? Thanks for the answer...I'm just trying to learn here.
OldTrader
Quote from OldTrader:
Let's set aside the cost question for a second. This computer came with a 290 x16. So given that, would you recommend getting a 285 to run my other two monitors? If so, would the only factor in your decision be the cost? Thanks for the answer...I'm just trying to learn here.
OldTrader
Quote from OldTrader:
I just have the 290 PCIe x16. It runs two monitors. I told Dell that I wanted to run 4 monitors.
OldTrader
Quote from Landis82:
I asked an Nvidia tech a couple of weeks ago ( in anticipation of my new rig ) about what I can run in my PCI-slot ( not the Express slots ) that will support a 3rd and 4th monitor on Windows XP, with their Nvidia "Nview" multi-monitor software application.
He pointed me to this $70.00 PCI-Slot card . . . the BFG Technologies GeForce 6200 graphics card with 256 mb of DDR:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814143110
The Nvidia tech said it would run on Vista, too and be compatible with other Nvdia driven graphics cards in the PCI-Express slot.