Quote from Cutten:
I would be interested to know how many of these 50 and 60 somethings in the video actually went to an independent financial advisor and asked him to construct a low-risk portfolio for retirement. My guess is almost none of them, because no honest financial planner would ever recommend a 100% long stock portfolio, backed up by an over-leveraged gamble on the housing market.
If any advisers did do this, then they should be sued. But the problem here IMO does not seem to be poor advice, it seems to be that people simply *did not ask for advice* from a professional advisor.
If you don't go to the doctor, and instead try to self-medicate, it's your fault if you get ill and die from a curable ailment. Financial advice is no different - if you do it yourself, make sure you are at the same level or better than the professionals.
You are correct! Do you know why most people never went to see any advisor? Trust! They trusted the people that came in and sold the plans. They trusted their HR department. It was a scam from the beginning and the average worker, having little or no knowledge about investing, just took the hustlers at their word. The pitch was simple. You Mr. Joe Lunchbucket, put in 6% of your gross and the company will match it. Take an average of 8% annual return, which was the historical figure they used, and viola, at 60 you're rich. That's how it was sold, and the average Joe had no reason, or point of reference to believe it to be false. Corporate America loved it because it was cheaper than funded pension plans. Wall Street loved it for all the obvious reasons. And the government...the government doesn't care either way. They play both ends and get their money and votes regardless of what happens. And the beat goes on!
